The natural selection of bad science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. F. Bond,et al. One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described , 2003 .
[2] M. Brent Donnellan,et al. Commentary and Rejoinder on Johnson, Cheung, and Donnellan (2014a) , 2014 .
[3] Alberto Acerbi,et al. If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution , 2015, Biology & philosophy.
[4] Donald T. Campbell,et al. Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change* , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.
[5] David Cyranoski,et al. Education: The PhD factory , 2011, Nature.
[6] M. Pentecost. The measures of success. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[7] Reginald B. Adams,et al. Theory building through replication response to commentaries on the "Many labs" replication project , 2014 .
[8] J. Hanspach,et al. An academia beyond quantity: a reply to Loyola et al. and Halme et al. , 2012 .
[9] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Surrogate Science , 2015 .
[10] H. Pashler,et al. Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[11] S. Schmidt. Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences , 2009 .
[12] CM Bennett,et al. Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction , 2009, NeuroImage.
[13] Paul E. Smaldino,et al. Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery , 2015, PloS one.
[14] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[15] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[16] David G. Rand,et al. Human cooperation , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[17] D. Lakens. Practical Recommendations to Increase the Informational Value of Studies , 2014 .
[18] Mina Bissell,et al. Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive , 2013, Nature.
[19] Daniel Sarewitz,et al. The pressure to publish pushes down quality , 2016, Nature.
[20] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems , 2006, PloS one.
[21] Arturo Casadevall,et al. Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? , 2013, PloS one.
[22] K. Popper. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .
[23] Willem M Otte,et al. Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis , 2015, British Medical Journal.
[24] Jeffrey Bowers,et al. Article Commentary: On the Persistence of Low Power in Psychological Science , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[25] A. Casadevall,et al. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index , 2011, Infection and Immunity.
[26] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[27] Jacob Cohen,et al. The earth is round , 1972 .
[28] Saul Perlmutter,et al. Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth , 2015, Nature.
[29] D. Campbell. Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .
[30] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[31] C. Goodhart. Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience , 1984 .
[32] Susan Feng Lu,et al. The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[33] François Brischoux,et al. Academia’s never-ending selection for productivity , 2015, Scientometrics.
[34] R. Swinburne. OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .
[35] J. Ioannidis,et al. Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce , 2014, PloS one.
[36] A. Mesoudi. Cultural Evolution , 2011, eLS.
[37] G. Loewenstein,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.
[38] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies , 1989 .
[39] Peder Olesen Larsen,et al. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.
[40] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .
[41] Björn Brembs,et al. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[42] M. R. Goe. . . . so animals could pull their weight, and more , 2000, Nature.
[43] Dennis D. Embry,et al. Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[45] R. Lucas. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .
[46] Kevin N Laland,et al. Culture evolves , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[47] J. Rossi,et al. Statistical power of psychological research: what have we gained in 20 years? , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[48] Leif D. Nelson,et al. False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.
[49] Juan Miguel Campanario,et al. Fraud: retracted articles are still being cited , 2000, Nature.
[50] Wei Li,et al. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[51] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Surrogates for Theories , 1998 .
[52] N. Kerr. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[53] Kendall Powell,et al. The future of the postdoc , 2015, Nature.
[54] A. Gelman,et al. The statistical crisis in science , 2014 .
[55] P. Meehl. Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox , 1967, Philosophy of Science.
[56] D. Lakens,et al. Sailing From the Seas of Chaos Into the Corridor of Stability , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[57] Jacob Cohen. The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .
[58] David L. Hull,et al. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .
[59] M. Rosenblatt,et al. An incentive-based approach for improving data reproducibility , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.
[60] David W. Peterson,et al. The Baby Factory , 2016 .
[61] O. Wolkenhauer. Why model? , 2013, Front. Physiol..
[62] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[63] M. Aoki. Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes* , 2007, Journal of Institutional Economics.
[64] Daniel MacArthur,et al. Methods: Face up to false positives , 2012, Nature.
[65] Neil Malhotra,et al. Underreporting in Political Science Survey Experiments: Comparing Questionnaires to Published Results , 2015, Political Analysis.
[66] C. Lumsden. Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .
[67] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[68] James C. Beaty,et al. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: a 30-year review. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.
[69] J. Ioannidis. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. , 2005, JAMA.
[70] N. Lazar,et al. The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose , 2016 .
[71] Daniel B. Larremore,et al. Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.
[72] Daniel Kahneman,et al. A new etiquette for replication. , 2014 .
[73] Research accomplishments that are too good to be true , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.
[74] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results , 2014 .
[75] Florence Debarre,et al. The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age , 2013, Current Biology.
[76] Anton Kühberger,et al. Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size , 2014, PloS one.
[77] Jacob Cohen,et al. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.
[78] Ulrich Dirnagl,et al. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility , 2015, Nature.
[79] Christoph Hauert,et al. Cooperation and coauthorship in scientific publishing. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[80] M. O'hare. The Darwin economy: : liberty, competition, and the common good , 2014 .
[81] Christoph Bartneck,et al. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.
[82] Ben R. Martin,et al. Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not? , 2016 .
[83] Simone Schnall,et al. Clean Data: Statistical Artefacts Wash Out Replication Efforts , 2014 .
[84] Neil Malhotra,et al. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer , 2014, Science.
[85] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Scientific Utopia , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[86] Fabrício Barreto Teresa,et al. Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers , 2014, Scientometrics.
[87] J. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[88] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. How to Make More Published Research True , 2014, PLoS medicine.
[89] H. Pashler,et al. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[90] Adam Eyre-Walker,et al. The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations , 2013, PLoS biology.
[91] Rense Nieuwenhuis. Measures of success , 2016 .
[92] B. Skinner,et al. Giving up the ghost , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[93] Richard Horton,et al. Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma? , 2015, The Lancet.
[94] J. Ioannidis. Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[95] Neil Malhotra,et al. Publication Bias in the Social Sciences , 2014 .
[96] P. Smaldino. The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[97] Maximiliaan Schillebeeckx,et al. The missing piece to changing the university culture , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.