User Involvement in the Design of Human - Computer Interactions: Some Similarities and Differences between Design Approaches

This paper reviews user involvement in the design of human—computer interactions, as advocated by a selection of different approaches to design. The selection comprises: User-Centred Design; Participatory Design; Socio-Technical Design; Soft Systems Methodology; and Joint Application Design. The review reveals a preliminary identification of non-configurable and configurable ‘attributes’ of user involvement in design, and their associated ‘values’, which characterise the similarities and differences between the design approaches. The attributes and values are intended in the longer term to support designers to compare and contrast various design approaches and to make more informed choices about the configuration of user involvement in design practice. Requirements for future research into the better understanding and configuring of user involvement are proposed.

[1]  Kenneth D. Eason,et al.  User-centred design: for users or by users? , 1995 .

[2]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Encountering Others: Reciprocal Openings in Participatory Design and User-Centered Design , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Tom Dayton,et al.  Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle , 1997 .

[4]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach , 1997 .

[5]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design , 1989, CHI '90.

[6]  John Karat,et al.  User centered design: quality or quackery? , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[7]  Jeff A. Johnson,et al.  ACE: building interactive graphical applications , 1993, CACM.

[8]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ken Eason,et al.  Understanding the Organisational Ramifications of Implementing Information Technology Systems , 1997 .

[10]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[11]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Costs and Benefits of User Involvement in Design: Practitioners' Views , 1996, BCS HCI.

[12]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[13]  Joan Greenbaum,et al.  PD a personal statement , 1993, CACM.

[14]  Ken Eason,et al.  Information technology and organisational change , 1988 .

[15]  Jane Wood,et al.  Joint Application Design: How to Design Quality Systems in 40% Less Time , 1989 .

[16]  John Karat,et al.  Evolving the scope of user-centered design , 1997, CACM.