Dynamic behavior investigations and disturbance rejection predictive control of solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture process

Abstract Increasing demand for flexible operation has posed significant challenges to the control system design of solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture (PCC) process: 1) the capture system itself has very slow dynamics; 2) in the case of wide range of operation, dynamic behavior of the PCC process will change significantly at different operating points; and 3) the frequent variation of upstream flue gas flowrate will bring in strong disturbances to the capture system. For these reasons, this paper provides a comprehensive study on the dynamic characteristics of the PCC process. The system dynamics under different CO2 capture rates, re-boiler temperatures, and flue gas flow rates are analyzed and compared through step-response tests. Based on the in-depth understanding of the system behavior, a disturbance rejection predictive controller (DRPC) is proposed for the PCC process. The predictive controller can track the desired CO2 capture rate quickly and smoothly in a wide operating range while tightly maintaining the re-boiler temperature around the optimal value. Active disturbance rejection approach is used in the predictive control design to improve the control property in the presence of dynamic variations or disturbances. The measured disturbances, such as the flue gas flow rate, is considered as an additional input in the predictive model development, so that accurate model prediction and timely control adjustment can be made once the disturbance is detected. For unmeasured disturbances, including model mismatches, plant behavior variations, etc., a disturbance observer is designed to estimate the value of disturbances. The estimated signal is then used as a compensation to the predictive control signal to remove the influence of disturbances. Simulations on a monoethanolamine (MEA) based PCC system developed on gCCS demonstrates the excellent effect of the proposed controller.

[1]  David Shan-Hill Wong,et al.  Plantwide control of CO2 capture by absorption and stripping using monoethanolamine solution , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[2]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control and H∞ robust control for a post-combustion CO2 capture process , 2018 .

[3]  Christine W. Chan,et al.  Application of neuro-fuzzy modeling technique for operational problem solving in a CO2 capture process system , 2013 .

[4]  Bernt Lie,et al.  Amine based CO2 capture plant: Dynamic modeling and simulations , 2013 .

[5]  Constantinos C. Pantelides,et al.  An Integrated Framework for the Dynamic Modelling of Solvent-based CO2 Capture Processes☆ , 2014 .

[6]  G. Feng,et al.  A Survey on Analysis and Design of Model-Based Fuzzy Control Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  Sergio Mussati,et al.  CO2 capture in power plants: Minimization of the investment and operating cost of the post-combustion process using MEA aqueous solution , 2012 .

[8]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Controllability and optimal scheduling of a CO2 capture plant using model predictive control , 2014 .

[9]  Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval,et al.  Flexible operation and simultaneous scheduling and control of a CO2 capture plant using model predictive control , 2016 .

[10]  Yongping Yang,et al.  Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA , 2012 .

[11]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Optimal Flexible Operation of a CO $_{2}$ Capture Power Plant in a Combined Energy and Carbon Emission Market , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Alfons Kather,et al.  Post-combustion CO2-capture from coal-fired power plants: Preliminary evaluation of an integrated chemical absorption process with piperazine-promoted potassium carbonate , 2008 .

[13]  H. Yeung,et al.  Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO2 chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[14]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic analysis and control design of a solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture process , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Aqueous Chemical Absorption , 2013 .

[16]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Demonstrating full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation , 2012 .

[17]  Carl D. Laird,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a CO2 Post-Combustion Absorption Unit , 2012 .

[18]  Markus Haider,et al.  Dynamic modeling of CO2 absorption from coal-fired power plants into an aqueous monoethanolamine solution , 2013 .

[19]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Dynamic Modeling and Evaluation of an Industrial-Scale CO2 Capture Plant Using Monoethanolamine Absorption Processes , 2014 .

[20]  Richard Faber,et al.  Open-loop step responses for the MEA post-combustion capture process: Experimental results from the Esbjerg pilot plant , 2011 .

[21]  Hong Jang,et al.  Optimal design for flexible operation of the post-combustion CO2 capture plant with uncertain economic factors , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Gerhard Schmitz,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the absorption/desorption loop of a carbon capture plant using an object-oriented approach , 2012 .

[23]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Dynamic Modeling to Minimize Energy Use for CO2 Capture in Power Plants by Aqueous Monoethanolamine , 2009 .

[24]  Ali Abbas,et al.  The hybrid MPC-MINLP algorithm for optimal operation of coal-fired power plants with solvent based post-combustion CO2 capture , 2017 .

[25]  Xiao Wu,et al.  Fuzzy modeling and stable model predictive tracking control of large-scale power plants , 2014 .

[26]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Economically efficient operation of CO2 capturing process. Part II. Design of control layer , 2012 .

[27]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Flexible operation of post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture for coal-fired power plants using multi-model predictive control: A simulation study , 2018 .

[28]  Shi-Shang Jang,et al.  Control strategies for flexible operation of power plant with CO2 capture plant , 2012 .

[29]  Johan Åkesson,et al.  Dynamic model of a post-combustion absorption unit for use in a non-linear model predictive control scheme , 2011 .

[30]  Kenneth R. Muske,et al.  Disturbance modeling for offset-free linear model predictive control , 2002 .

[31]  Mai Bui,et al.  Flexible operation of CSIRO's post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant at the AGL Loy Yang power station , 2016 .

[32]  Debangsu Bhattacharyya,et al.  Development of Model and Model-Predictive Control of an MEA-Based Postcombustion CO2 Capture Process , 2016 .

[33]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Capital costs and energy considerations of different alternative stripper configurations for post combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[34]  Ali Abbas,et al.  Dynamic modelling and control strategies for flexible operation of amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture systems , 2015 .

[35]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[36]  Ali Abbas,et al.  Dynamic modelling, identification and preliminary control analysis of an amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant , 2016 .

[37]  Jochen Oexmann,et al.  Post-combustion CO2 capture : energetic evaluation of chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants , 2011 .

[38]  Niall Mac Dowell,et al.  Process control strategies for flexible operation of post-combustion CO2 capture plants , 2017 .

[39]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants , 2009 .

[40]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Modelling of a post-combustion CO2 capture process using neural networks , 2015 .

[41]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Economically efficient operation of CO2 capturing process part I: Self-optimizing procedure for selecting the best controlled variables , 2011 .

[42]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Dynamic modelling and control of MEA absorption processes for CO2 capture from power plants , 2014 .