Evaluation for causal effects of socioeconomic traits on risk of female genital prolapse (FGP): a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
Wenjuan Wu | Zhaohui Qu | Wei Zhang | Huiling Pan | Jing Ge | Hua Lei | Honggu Chen
[1] W. Negash,et al. Determinants of early marriage among married women in nine high fertility sub-Saharan African countries: a multilevel analysis of recent demographic and health surveys , 2022, BMC public health.
[2] D. Kerr,et al. A systematic review examining socioeconomic factors in trials of interventions for men that report weight as an outcome , 2022, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.
[3] M. Boisgontier,et al. Early-Life Socioeconomic Circumstances and Physical Activity in Older Age: Women Pay the Price , 2022, Psychological science.
[4] H. Pan,et al. No Genetic Causal Association Between Periodontitis and Arthritis: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.
[5] Z. Mo,et al. The role of age at menarche and age at menopause in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a bidirectional mendelian randomization study , 2021, Aging.
[6] E. Munsaka,et al. Economic support, education and sexual decision making among female adolescents in Zambia: a qualitative study , 2021, BMC Public Health.
[7] Jiayi Shen,et al. A modifiable risk factors atlas of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study , 2021, Cancer medicine.
[8] A. Talukder,et al. Sociodemographic factors and early marriage among women in Bangladesh, Ghana and Iraq: An illustration from Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey , 2021, Heliyon.
[9] I. E. Ertas,et al. Comparison of life quality between geriatric patients who underwent reconstructive surgery and obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. , 2021, Ginekologia polska.
[10] B. Rachet,et al. Socioeconomic Inequalities and Ethnicity Are Associated with a Positive COVID-19 Test among Cancer Patients in the UK Biobank Cohort , 2021, Cancers.
[11] A. K. Tesema,et al. Early Marriage and Its Determinants among Married Reproductive Age Group Women in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis , 2021, BioMed research international.
[12] R. Svento,et al. Leisure-time physical activity is associated with socio-economic status beyond income - Cross-sectional survey of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. , 2021, Economics and human biology.
[13] Yun Tian,et al. Bidirectional Causal Associations Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis , 2020, Frontiers in Genetics.
[14] Z. Shao,et al. Mendelian randomization study of inflammatory bowel disease and bone mineral density , 2020, BMC Medicine.
[15] S. Larsson,et al. Circulating Lipoprotein Lipids, Apolipoproteins and Ischemic Stroke , 2020, Annals of neurology.
[16] H. Deng,et al. Detecting causal relationship between metabolic traits and osteoporosis using multivariable Mendelian randomization , 2020, Osteoporosis International.
[17] P. Tulikangas,et al. Relationship Between Maternal Age at First Delivery and Subsequent Pelvic Organ Prolapse. , 2020, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.
[18] A. Borri,et al. Laparoscopic vaginal lateral suspension: technical aspects and initial experience. , 2020, Minerva chirurgica.
[19] S. Larsson,et al. An atlas on risk factors for multiple sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study , 2020, Journal of Neurology.
[20] Rongsen Zhang,et al. Application and interpretation of Mendelian randomization approaches in exploring the causality between folate and coronary artery disease. , 2020, The American journal of clinical nutrition.
[21] H. Goldschmidt,et al. Search for multiple myeloma risk factors using Mendelian randomization. , 2020, Blood advances.
[22] M. Tobin,et al. Identifying potential causal effects of age at menarche: a Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study , 2020, BMC Medicine.
[23] L. Millard,et al. Impact of sex hormone-binding globulin on the human phenome , 2020, Human molecular genetics.
[24] J. Bradley. Socioeconomic status is associated with physical activity in leisure time only , 2020, BMJ.
[25] E. Beckman,et al. Symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse in women who lift heavy weights for exercise: a cross-sectional survey , 2019, International Urogynecology Journal.
[26] I. Carlsson,et al. Online reported women’s experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal birth , 2019, BMC Women's Health.
[27] Stephen Burgess,et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype–phenotype associations , 2019, Bioinform..
[28] Brent A. Langellier,et al. The Relationship Between Educational Attainment and Health Care Access and Use Among Mexicans, Mexican Americans, and U.S.–Mexico Migrants , 2019, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health.
[29] C. C. Chen,et al. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorders in women seeking primary care: a cross-sectional study , 2019, BMC Family Practice.
[30] D. Lovejoy,et al. Breastfeeding and pelvic floor disorders one to two decades after vaginal delivery. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[31] P. Deloukas,et al. Mendelian randomisation analyses find pulmonary factors mediate the effect of height on coronary artery disease , 2019, Communications Biology.
[32] A. K. Tekile,et al. Determinants of early marriage among female children in Amhara Region, Ethiopia , 2018, African health sciences.
[33] M. Munafo,et al. MR-pheWAS with stratification and interaction: Searching for the causal effects of smoking heaviness identified an effect on facial aging , 2018, bioRxiv.
[34] A. Poudel,et al. Uterine prolapse: a hidden tragedy of women in rural Nepal , 2018, International Urogynecology Journal.
[35] Jonathan P. Beauchamp,et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals , 2018, Nature Genetics.
[36] G. Davey Smith,et al. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[37] V. Rasch,et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: A population based study in Tanzanian rural community , 2018, PloS one.
[38] B. Neale,et al. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases , 2018, Nature Genetics.
[39] S. Burgess,et al. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates , 2018, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[40] F. Dick,et al. Understanding Confounding in Observational Studies. , 2018, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[41] I. Kåreholt,et al. Different indicators of socioeconomic status and their relative importance as determinants of health in old age , 2017, International Journal for Equity in Health.
[42] N. Sattar,et al. Reverse Causality in Cardiovascular Epidemiological Research: More Common Than Imagined? , 2017, Circulation.
[43] S. Thompson,et al. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method , 2017, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[44] Tesfaye Setegn,et al. Determinants of pelvic organ prolapse among gynecologic patients in Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia: a case–control study , 2016, International journal of women's health.
[45] F. Hartwig,et al. Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.
[46] H. Dietz,et al. Delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective observational study , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[47] M. Barber. Pelvic organ prolapse , 2016, British Medical Journal.
[48] Stephen Burgess,et al. PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype–phenotype associations , 2016, Bioinform..
[49] A. Caughey,et al. Obesity and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Battling the Bulge , 2016, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.
[50] M. Barber,et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) , 2016, International Urogynecology Journal.
[51] Nuala A Sheehan,et al. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome , 2015, Statistics in medicine.
[52] M. Petzold,et al. Uterine prolapse and its impact on quality of life in the Jhaukhel–Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site, Bhaktapur, Nepal , 2015, Global health action.
[53] M. Petzold,et al. Uterine prolapse and its impact on quality of life in the Jhaukhel–Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site, Bhaktapur, Nepal , 2015, Global health action.
[54] F. Hammad,et al. Prevalence, risk factors and severity of symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse among Emirati women , 2015, BMC Urology.
[55] J. Shaw,et al. Lifetime physical activity and female stress urinary incontinence. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[56] K. Kluivers,et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review , 2015, International Urogynecology Journal.
[57] A. Monga,et al. Obesity and pelvic floor dysfunction. , 2015, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.
[58] K. Anderson,et al. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. , 2015, The Medical clinics of North America.
[59] S. Thompson,et al. Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: The Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects , 2015, American journal of epidemiology.
[60] E. Røysamb,et al. Sex Differences in Genetic and Environmental Influences on Educational Attainment and Income , 2014, Twin Research and Human Genetics.
[61] Nathan C. Nickel,et al. The effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status on education and health outcomes for children living in social housing. , 2014, American journal of public health.
[62] G. Davey Smith,et al. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies , 2014, Human molecular genetics.
[63] J. Shaw,et al. Lifetime physical activity and pelvic organ prolapse in middle-aged women. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[64] A. D. de Craen,et al. Using genetic variation for establishing causality of cardiovascular risk factors: overcoming confounding and reverse causality , 2014, Netherlands Heart Journal.
[65] Laura Gottlieb,et al. The Social Determinants of Health: It's Time to Consider the Causes of the Causes , 2014, Public health reports.
[66] C. Maher,et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function , 2013, International Urogynecology Journal.
[67] P. Visscher,et al. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.
[68] G. Welk,et al. Gender, weight status and socioeconomic differences in psychosocial correlates of physical activity in schoolchildren. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.
[69] A. Yeniel,et al. How do delivery mode and parity affect pelvic organ prolapse? , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[70] Victoria L Handa,et al. Vaginal Childbirth and Pelvic Floor Disorders , 2013, Women's health.
[71] I. Milsom,et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[72] M. Buxton,et al. Physical activity in England: who is meeting the recommended level of participation through sports and exercise? , 2012, European journal of public health.
[73] J. Brug,et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: A systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.
[74] G. Hobbs,et al. A prospective cohort study of pelvic support changes among nulliparous, multiparous, and pre- and post-menopausal women. , 2012, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[75] S. Thompson,et al. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. , 2011, International journal of epidemiology.
[76] L. Lynd,et al. Agreement between aggregate and individual-level measures of income and education: a comparison across three patient groups , 2011, BMC health services research.
[77] B. Howard,et al. Risk Factors for Prolapse Development in White, Black, and Hispanic Women , 2011, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.
[78] O. Unal,et al. Caesarean delivery or vaginal birth: Preference of Turkish pregnant women and influencing factors , 2010, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
[79] R. Negro,et al. Age-related pelvic floor modifications and prolapse risk factors in postmenopausal women , 2010, Menopause.
[80] G. Rørtveit,et al. Racial Differences in Pelvic Organ Prolapse , 2009, Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[81] M. E. Ellström Engh,et al. Pelvic floor function is independently associated with pelvic organ prolapse , 2009, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[82] M. Eijkemans,et al. Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population , 2009, International Urogynecology Journal.
[83] J. Schaffer,et al. Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study , 2006, International Urogynecology Journal.
[84] D. Lawlor,et al. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1) , 2005, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
[85] A. O'Boyle,et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[86] C. Bradley,et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women: Prevalence and Risk Factors , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[87] J. Dunn. Housing and inequalities in health: a study of socioeconomic dimensions of housing and self reported health from a survey of Vancouver residents , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[88] M. Lindström,et al. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. , 2001, Social science & medicine.
[89] A. Döring,et al. [Correlation between dietary behavior and educational attainment: results of the 1984/85 nutrition survey of the Augsburg MONICA project]. , 1995, Zeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft.
[90] J. Queiroz,et al. [Vaginal discharge: conditioning factors in different socio-economic groups in Londrina, Parana (author's transl)]. , 1981, Jornal brasileiro de ginecologia.
[91] Aideen T. O’Neill,et al. Knowledge of pelvic floor problems: a study of third trimester, primiparous women , 2016, International Urogynecology Journal.
[92] N. Perone. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[93] Mph Dr. Xiaoxing Z. He MD,et al. Differences in leisure-time, household, and work-related physical activity by race, ethnicity, and education , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[94] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..
[95] C. Campagnoli,et al. Risk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause. Results from a large cross-sectional study in menopausal clinics in Italy. Progetto Menopausa Italia Study Group. , 2000, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[96] R. Sanson-Fisher,et al. Practitioner provision of preventive care in general practice consultations: association with patient educational and occupational status. , 1997, Social science & medicine.
[97] David R. Williams,et al. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. , 1997, Annual review of public health.