Choice: Effects of changeover schedules on concurrent performance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. K. Honig. Operant behavior : areas of research and application , 1966 .
[2] S S Pliskoff,et al. Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[3] I W Hunter,et al. Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] K L Wheatley,et al. Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[5] M. Rilling,et al. Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6] W. Hoeffding,et al. Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .
[7] R J HERRNSTEIN,et al. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[8] R L Menlove,et al. Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[9] A. Neuringer. Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[10] I W Hunter,et al. Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[11] R. Herrnstein. On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[12] D L Myers,et al. Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[13] W M Baum,et al. The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[14] M C Davison,et al. Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] D M THOMPSON,et al. ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[16] E. L. Edmon. Multiple schedule component duration: a reanalysis of Shimp and Wheatley (1971) and Todorov (1972). , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[17] L R Gollub,et al. Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[18] N. Squires,et al. Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[19] William M. Baum,et al. BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST OF TIME ALLOCATION1 , 1976 .
[20] G. D. Lachter. Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[21] A. Catania,et al. Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[22] J C Todorov,et al. Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[23] D. Stubbs,et al. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[24] C. Shimp. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[25] J D Findley,et al. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.