Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation

Based on self-determination theory, the present study developed and evaluated the utility a school-based intervention to change pupils’ physical activity intentions and self-reported leisure-time physical activity behaviour. The study evaluated utility of the intervention to promote physical activity participation over a 5-week interval of time. A cluster randomised design targeting 215 pupils from 10 schools with schools as the unit of randomisation was adopted (Male = 106, Female = 109, Age = 14.84, SD = 0.48). Results indicated that pupils who were taught by autonomy-supportive teachers reported stronger intentions to exercise during leisure time and participated more frequently in leisure-time physical activities than pupils in the control condition. Autonomous motivation and intentions mediated the effects of the intervention on self-reported physical activity behaviour. It is concluded that self-determination theory provides a useful framework for the development of school-based interventions that ultimately affect leisure-time physical activity participation.

[1]  J. Reeve,et al.  What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. , 2006 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[3]  Martyn Standage,et al.  A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[5]  S. Biddle,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables , 2002 .

[6]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[7]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[9]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[10]  Martin S. Hagger,et al.  The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model , 2003 .

[11]  R. Shephard,et al.  A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. , 1969, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[12]  N. Ntoumanis,et al.  A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[13]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation underlying career choice for internal medicine and surgery. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[14]  K. Fox,et al.  Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. , 1994, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  Martyn Standage,et al.  A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. , 2003 .

[16]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Using the friedman method of ranks for model comparison in structural equation modeling , 1999 .

[17]  R. Fazio.  Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework , 1990 .

[18]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[19]  Fred S. Switzer,et al.  A Monte Carlo Analysis of Missing Data Techniques in a HRM Setting , 1995 .

[20]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[22]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[23]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[24]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[25]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[26]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Willy Lens,et al.  Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement. , 2005, Child development.

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  I. Ajzen.  Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives , 2002 .

[30]  S. Biddle,et al.  The Cognitive Processes by which Perceived Locus of Causality Predicts Participation in Physical Activity , 2002, Journal of health psychology.

[31]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Beyond autoregressive models: some implications of the trait-state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change. , 1987, Child development.

[32]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[33]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[34]  Willy Lens,et al.  How to Become a Persevering Exerciser? Providing a Clear, Future Intrinsic Goal in an Autonomy-Supportive Way , 2004 .

[35]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. , 1980 .

[36]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Doing the Four-Step Right , 2000 .

[37]  Vassilis Barkoukis,et al.  Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity : A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model , 2005 .

[38]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[39]  John R. Nesselroade,et al.  Beyond autoregressive models: some implications of the trait-state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change. , 1987, Child development.

[40]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[41]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[43]  N. Ntoumanis.  A Prospective Study of Participation in Optional School Physical Education Using a Self-Determination Theory Framework. , 2005 .