Trust and the Strength of Ties in Online Social Networks: An Exploratory Field Experiment

We conduct an exploratory study using a customized Facebook application to understand how social ties are linked to an economic measure of trust. We employ the Investment Game, a well-established economic game designed to generate a quantifiable trust measure. We consider the relationship between observed trust and three "revealed preference" tie strength measures: (1) the degree of interaction between friends on their walls; (2) embeddedness, a metric related to the number of mutual friends shared; and (3) being tagged together in a photograph, indicative of a physical-world interaction. We identify latent heterogeneity among our subjects, establishing that for users with a large number of Facebook friends, the only measure associated with trust is whether the dyad was tagged in a photo together. In contrast, for users that are more selective and have fewer Facebook friends, all three aforementioned tie strength measures correlate with trust. Our findings are preliminary evidence that traditional measures of dyadic trust like embeddedness which are used widely in physical-world social networks may not always be effective predictors of digital trust, because not all online social ties are created equal. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that traditional measures of dyadic trust may not always be effective predictors of trust, as not all online social ies are created equal.

[1]  S. Lindskold Trust development, the GRIT proposal, and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. , 1978 .

[2]  A. Sundararajan The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism , 2016 .

[3]  M. Mobius,et al.  Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2009 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  George A. Akerlof The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[6]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[7]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Let's Get Personal: An International Examination of the Influence of Communication, Culture and Social Distance on Other Regarding Preferences , 2006 .

[8]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. , 1995 .

[9]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Gerard Delanty The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[11]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[12]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[13]  Emanuela Sciubba,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness and social networks: Playing a trust game when networks are formed in the lab , 2010 .

[14]  Stephen Leider,et al.  What Do We Expect From Our Friends , 2009 .

[15]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[17]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  The Human Face of Game Theory: Trust and Reciprocity in Sequential Games , 2003 .

[18]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[19]  Rachel Croson,et al.  The Method of Experimental Economics , 2005 .

[20]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[21]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[22]  W. Bridges,et al.  Informal Hiring and Income in the Labor Market , 1986 .

[23]  Sarah C. Rice Reputation and Uncertainty in Online Markets: An Experimental Study , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[25]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[26]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Edward,et al.  Measuring Trust , 2000 .

[28]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  Trust, Risk and Betrayal , 2003 .

[29]  Charles Z. Liu,et al.  Method Effects in IS Survey Research: An Assessment and Recommendations , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[31]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[32]  M. Deutsch,et al.  Conflict Cooperation and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch , 1995 .

[33]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Trust and discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach , 2001 .

[35]  P. Dasgupta Trust as a commodity , 1988 .

[36]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  R. Brandis The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[38]  M. Mobius,et al.  Trust and Social Collateral , 2007 .

[39]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Trust Building Among Strangers , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Alexandra A. Mislin,et al.  Trust games: A meta-analysis , 2011 .

[41]  R. Dawes,et al.  Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross‐Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels , 1987 .

[43]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[44]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Trust and deception in mediated communication , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[45]  Michael Lokshin,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Endogenous Switching Regression Models , 2004 .

[46]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .

[47]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[48]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[49]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[50]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Cooperation Among Strangers with Limited Information About Reputation , 2003 .

[51]  David Fielding,et al.  Does trust extend beyond the village? Experimental trust and social distance in Cameroon , 2011 .

[52]  Dietmar Fehr,et al.  Social Distance and Trust: Experimental Evidence from a Slum in Cairo , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.