Consistent image registration

Presents a new method for image registration based on jointly estimating the forward and reverse transformations between two images while constraining these transforms to be inverses of one another. This approach produces a consistent set of transformations that have less pairwise registration error, i.e., better correspondence, than traditional methods that estimate the forward and reverse transformations independently. The transformations are estimated iteratively and are restricted to preserve topology by constraining them to obey the laws of continuum mechanics. The transformations are parameterized by a Fourier series to diagonalize the covariance structure imposed by the continuum mechanics constraints and to provide a computationally efficient numerical implementation. Results using a linear elastic material constraint are presented using both magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography image data. The results show that the joint estimation of a consistent set of forward and reverse transformations constrained by linear-elasticity give better registration results than using either constraint alone or none at all.

[1]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[2]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The Measurement of Biological Shape and Shape Change. , 1980 .

[4]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Development of a point-based shape representation of arbitrary three-dimensional medical objects suitable for statistical shape modeling , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Approximating Thin-Plate Splines for Elastic Registration: Integration of Landmark Errors and Orientation Attributes , 1999, IPMI.

[7]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Image registration based on boundary mapping , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[9]  L. Segel,et al.  Mathematics Applied to Continuum Mechanics , 1977 .

[10]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Morphometric tools for landmark data , 1993 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial Normalization Nonlinear Spatial Normalization Using Basis Functions Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization 2.1 the Basic Optimization Algorithm 1 C a from This We Can Derive an , 1999 .

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  High-Dimensional Image Registration Using Symmetric Priors , 1999, NeuroImage.

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  P. Fox,et al.  Surface-based spatial nor-malization using convex hulls , 1999 .

[20]  James C. Gee,et al.  Probabilistic Matching of Brain Images , 1995 .

[21]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  Zhaowei Jiang,et al.  Consistency analysis for digitized three-dimensional Talairach's Co-Planner Stereotactic Atlas of the human brain , 1997 .

[23]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical-Functional Correlation Using an Adjustable MRI-Based Region of Interest Atlas with Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[25]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[26]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  Yali Amit,et al.  A Nonlinear Variational Problem for Image Matching , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[28]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  M I Miller,et al.  Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Subsol Crest Lines for Curve-Based Warping , 1999 .