Ambient temperature variation affects radiological diagnostic performance

No guidelines currently exist for optimum ambient temperature during radiology reporting. The objective of this study is to determine whether changes in ambient temperature effect performance during radiological detection tasks. Ambient temperatures and humidity were measured in 11 radiological reporting environments. Observers were then asked to assess CT images at 18°C, 21°C and 23°C. Thirty non-contrast cranial CT images, 15 with Intra cranial bleeds and 15 without were used. A ROC analysis was performed. The shortest time taken to assess the images was recorded at 18°C which took 10.5 (sd 4.07) seconds per image this was significantly shorter than 21°C which took 14.93 seconds (sd 3.87) (p ≤ 0.017). There is a trend of increasing sensitivity with decreasing temperature with 18, 21 and 23°C resulting in sensitivity values of 0.52, 0,42 and 0.37 respectively, with 18°C (0.52 sd 0.21) resulting in significantly higher sensitivity than 23°C (0.37 sd 0.14) (p ≤ 0.030).

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Zalis,et al.  Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  K. Collins,et al.  Low indoor temperatures and morbidity in the elderly. , 1986, Age and ageing.

[4]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  The effects of classroom air temperature and outdoor air supply rate on performance of school work by children , 2005 .

[5]  Rachel Toomey,et al.  The impact of acoustic noise found within clinical departments on radiology performance. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[6]  Paul Nagy,et al.  PACS reading room design. , 2003, Seminars in roentgenology.

[7]  Patrick C. Brennan,et al.  Ambient lighting: setting international standards for the viewing of softcopy chest images , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  F Sim,et al.  Are you sitting comfortably? , 2009, BDJ.

[9]  N Buls,et al.  Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  D P Thompson,et al.  Practical assessment of the display performance of radiology workstations. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  David J Manning,et al.  Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  P R Goddard,et al.  Ergonomics of digital imaging. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Soft-Copy Reading of Digital Chest Radiographs: Effect of Ambient Light and Automatic Optimization of Monitor Luminance , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  The Design Challenge , 1998, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..