Retrofit of a hospital through strength reduction and enhanced damping

A procedure to retrofit existing essential facilities subjected to seismic excitation is proposed. The main features of this procedure are to reduce maximum acceleration and associated forces in buildings subjected to seismic excitation by reducing their strength (weakening). The weakening retrofit, which is an opposite strategy to strengthening, is particularly suitable for buildings having overstressed components and foundation supports or having weak brittle components. However, by weakening the structure large deformations are expected. Supplemental damping devices however can control the deformations within desirable limits. The structure retrofitted with this strategy will have, therefore, a reduction in the acceleration response and a reduction in the deformations, depending on the amount of additional damping introduced in the structure. An illustration of the above strategy is presented here through an evaluation of the inelastic response of the structure through a nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results are compared with different retrofit techniques. A parametric analysis has also been carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of the retrofitting method using different combination of the performance thresholds in accelerations and displacements through fragility analysis.

[1]  R. Barrón-Corvera.  Spectral evaluation of seismic fragility of structures , 2001 .

[2]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Ductile design of steel structures , 1997 .

[3]  A. Papageorgiou,et al.  A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. I. Description of the model , 1983 .

[4]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Retrofit of Structures: Strength Reduction with Damping Enhancement , 2005 .

[5]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Design of Amplified Structural Damping Using Optimal Considerations , 2003 .

[6]  J. F. Abel,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Steel Frames with Semi-rigid Connections Using the Capacity Spectrum Method , 1991 .

[7]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Modeling of Masonry Infill Panels for Structural Analysis , 1995 .

[8]  John B. Mander,et al.  Normalized Damage Index for Evaluation of Buildings , 1989 .

[9]  Ramiro E Vargas.  Analytical and experimental investigation of the structural fuse concept , 2006 .

[10]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures , 2000 .

[11]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES WITH SUPPLEMENTAL DAMPING: PART 1 - FLUID VISCOUS DAMPING DEVICES , 1995 .

[12]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[13]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[14]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities , 2003 .

[15]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Multi-Dimensional Fragility of Structures: Formulation and Evaluation , 2006 .