Correcting inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R 1 mapping at 7T

Purpose: Inter-scan motion is a substantial source of error in R1 estimation, and can be expected to increase at 7T where B1 fields are more inhomogeneous. The established correction scheme does not translate to 7T since it requires a body coil reference. Here we introduce two alternatives that outperform the established method. Since they compute relative sensitivities they do not require body coil images. Theory: The proposed methods use coil-combined magnitude images to obtain the relative coil sensitivities. The first method efficiently computes the relative sensitivities via a simple ratio; the second by fitting a more sophisticated generative model. Methods: R1 maps were computed using the variable flip angle (VFA) approach. Multiple datasets were acquired at 3T and 7T, with and without motion between the acquisition of the VFA volumes. R1 maps were constructed without correction, with the proposed corrections, and (at 3T) with the previously established correction scheme. Results: At 3T, the proposed methods outperform the baseline method. Inter-scan motion artefacts were also reduced at 7T. However, reproducibility only converged on that of the no motion condition if position-specific transmit field effects were also incorporated. Conclusion: The proposed methods simplify inter-scan motion correction of R1 maps and are applicable at both 3T and 7T, where a body coil is typically not available. The open-source code for all methods is made publicly available. Keywords— qMRI, inter-scan motion, sensitivity, generative modelling, R1, 7T

[1]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Multiparameter mapping of relaxation (R1, R2*), proton density and magnetization transfer saturation at 3 T: A multicenter dual‐vendor reproducibility and repeatability study , 2020, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Correction of inter‐scan motion artifacts in quantitative R1 mapping by accounting for receive coil sensitivity effects , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R. Wise,et al.  Specific absorption rate implications of within‐scan patient head motion for ultra‐high field MRI , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  J. Finsterbusch,et al.  Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  O. Josephs,et al.  Robust and Fast Whole Brain Mapping of the RF Transmit Field B1 at 7T , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  A Majorize-Minimize Framework for Rician and Non-Central Chi MR Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  B. Rutt,et al.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  P. Dechent,et al.  High‐resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  John Ashburner,et al.  Model-based multi-parameter mapping , 2021, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Michel Luong,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of the specific absorption rate intersubject variability safety factor in parallel transmission MRI , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Influence of RF spoiling on the stability and accuracy of T1 mapping based on spoiled FLASH with varying flip angles , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research , 2019, NeuroImage.

[16]  P. Dechent,et al.  Quantitative FLASH MRI at 3T using a rational approximation of the Ernst equation , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Gerard R. Ridgway,et al.  Symmetric Diffeomorphic Modeling of Longitudinal Structural MRI , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[18]  O Speck,et al.  SAR simulations for high‐field MRI: How much detail, effort, and accuracy is needed? , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  N. Weiskopf,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain anatomy and in vivo histology , 2021, Nature Reviews Physics.

[20]  Lars Ruthotto,et al.  hMRI – A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research , 2019, NeuroImage.

[21]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  A 16‐channel dual‐row transmit array in combination with a 31‐element receive array for human brain imaging at 9.4 T , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.