Electrostatic shielding in patterned carbon nanotube field emission arrays

As the morphologies of patterned carbon nanotube (CNT) field emission arrays become more complex, it is critical to examine the interactions of individual emitters in close proximity to one another. The number of active emission sites in dense arrays can be severely inhibited by electrostatic shielding. To explore this effect, we have fabricated an array of microscale CNT bundles with varying diameters. Field enhancement was found to increase with decreasing bundle diameter. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy revealed a corresponding increase in the number of stray CNT tips as the bundle diameter decreased. These CNT tips were not as heavily shielded, resulting in improved emission current density. Our results confirm that electrostatic shielding significantly affects the field enhancement of dense arrays, particularly in terms of the number of emitters actively participating in the field emission process.

[1]  Young Hee Lee,et al.  Patterned growth and field emission properties of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes , 2001 .

[2]  J. Sohn,et al.  Patterned selective growth of carbon nanotubes and large field emission from vertically well-aligned carbon nanotube field emitter arrays , 2001 .

[3]  C. Adessi,et al.  Theoretical study of field emission by single-wall carbon nanotubes , 2000 .

[4]  M. H. Lee,et al.  Dynamical simulation of field emission in nanostructures , 2002 .

[5]  D. Tuggle,et al.  Effects of catalysts on the internal structures of carbon nanotubes and corresponding electron field-emission properties , 2004 .

[6]  N. Xu,et al.  Quantum-mechanical investigation of field-emission mechanism of a micrometer-long single-walled carbon nanotube. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[7]  H. Dai,et al.  Self-oriented regular arrays of carbon nanotubes and their field emission properties , 1999, Science.

[8]  Young Hee Lee,et al.  Fully sealed, high-brightness carbon-nanotube field-emission display , 1999 .

[9]  Klaus Kern,et al.  Scanning field emission from patterned carbon nanotube films , 2000 .

[10]  J. Ihm,et al.  First-principles study of field emission of carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[11]  Jung Sang Suh,et al.  Study of the field-screening effect of highly ordered carbon nanotube arrays , 2002 .

[12]  Gehan A. J. Amaratunga,et al.  Plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition carbon nanotubes/nanofibres—how uniform do they grow? , 2003 .

[13]  Alexandre Mayer,et al.  Theoretical comparison between field emission from single-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[14]  Y. Kawazoe,et al.  Localized valence states characteristics and work function of single-walled carbon nanotubes: A first-principles study , 2002 .

[15]  G. Amaratunga,et al.  Field emission from short and stubby vertically aligned carbon nanotubes , 2001 .

[16]  R. Fowler,et al.  Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields , 1928 .

[17]  Kenjiro Yamada.  Shock synthesis of concentric shell fullerene dimers and trimers , 2004 .

[18]  D. Chung,et al.  Field emission from 4.5 in. single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotube films , 2000 .

[19]  N. Xu,et al.  Chiral and quantum size effects of single-wall carbon nanotubes on field emission , 2004 .

[20]  A. Buldum,et al.  Electron field emission properties of closed carbon nanotubes. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[21]  Michael E. Hoenk,et al.  High-current-density field emitters based on arrays of carbon nanotube bundles , 2005 .

[22]  Louis Schlapbach,et al.  Field emission properties of carbon nanotubes , 2000 .

[23]  N. Xu,et al.  Quantum mechanical understanding of field dependence of the apex barrier of a single-wall carbon nanotube , 2005 .

[24]  N. Xu,et al.  Chirality effect of single-wall carbon nanotubes on field emission , 2003 .