The Distribution of Second Degrees in the Buckley–Osthus Random Graph Model

In this article we consider a well-known generalization of the Barabási and Albert preferential attachment model—the Buckley–Osthus model. Buckley and Osthus proved that in this model, the degree sequence has a power law distribution. As a natural (and arguably more interesting) next step, we study the second degrees of vertices. Roughly speaking, the second degree of a vertex is the number of vertices at distance two from the given vertex. The distribution of second degrees is of interest because it is a good approximation of PageRank, where the importance of a vertex is measured by taking into account the popularity of its neighbors. We prove that the second degrees also obey a power law. More precisely, we estimate the expectation of the number of vertices with the second degree greater than or equal to k and prove the concentration of this random variable around its expectation using the now-famous Talagrand's concentration inequality over product spaces. As far as we know, this is the only application of Talagrand's inequality to random web graphs where the (preferential attachment) edges are not defined over a product distribution, making the application nontrivial and requiring a certain degree of novelty.

[1]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Structure of growing networks with preferential linking. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[2]  Liudmila Ostroumova,et al.  The distribution of second degrees in the Bollob\'as--Riordan random graph model , 2011, 1108.5585.

[3]  Deryk Osthus,et al.  Popularity based random graph models leading to a scale-free degree sequence , 2004, Discret. Math..

[4]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[5]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[6]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs, Second Edition , 2001, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics.

[7]  Svante Janson,et al.  Random graphs , 2000, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization.

[8]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[9]  Gleb Gusev,et al.  Empirical validation of the buckley-osthus model for the web host graph: degree and edge distributions , 2012, CIKM.

[10]  Mihaela Enachescu,et al.  Variations on Random Graph Models for the Web , 2001 .

[11]  A. Rbnyi ON THE EVOLUTION OF RANDOM GRAPHS , 2001 .

[12]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Mathematical results on scale‐free random graphs , 2005 .

[13]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The degree sequence of a scale‐free random graph process , 2001, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[14]  Kazuoki Azuma WEIGHTED SUMS OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT RANDOM VARIABLES , 1967 .

[15]  Bálint Tóth,et al.  Random trees and general branching processes , 2007, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[16]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[17]  Noga Alon,et al.  The Probabilistic Method , 2015, Fundamentals of Ramsey Theory.

[18]  Amin Saberi,et al.  A Weak Local Limit for Preferential Attachment Graphs , 2009 .

[19]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  The Diameter of a Scale-Free Random Graph , 2004, Comb..

[20]  M. Talagrand Concentration of measure and isoperimetric inequalities in product spaces , 1994, math/9406212.

[21]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[22]  Evgeny A. Grechnikov,et al.  Degree Distribution and Number of Edges between Nodes of Given Degrees in the Buckley–Osthus Model of a Random Web Graph , 2011, Internet Math..

[23]  SpencerJoel,et al.  The degree sequence of a scale-free random graph process , 2001 .