Examining the Effects of HMDs/FSDs and Gender Differences on Cognitive Processing Ability and User Experience of the Stroop Task-Embedded Virtual Reality Driving System (STEVRDS)

The advent of virtual reality technology has provided a new approach for assessing and training cognitive processing ability, with the design of simulations used to replicate real events in everyday lives. To better understand how head mounted displays/flat screen displays (HMDs/FSDs) and differences in the individuals who use them affect cognitive performance and the use of VR systems, our research group created the Stroop task-embedded virtual reality driving system (STEVRDS) and conducted a 2 $\times $ 2 between-group factorial design experiment among college students. The study examined the effects of HMDs and FSDs that differ in monovision/stereovision and field of view, the impact of gender (males vs. females) on users’ performances in virtual driving and Stroop trials, and users’ psychophysiological responses while using the system. The participants’ subjective perceptions toward STEVRDS were also assessed to support the analyses/interpretations of cognitive performance, as well as provide empirical data relating to user experiences. The statistical analyses showed both main and interaction effects of HMDs/FSDs and gender on task performance, psychophysiological responses, and user evaluations of the system. The psychophysiological patterns exhibited during the use of STEVRDS further extended the findings. Overall, our results were comparable with cognitive phenomena reported in other studies/in real-life experiences or explained by logical reasoning, which suggests that the design/development of the STEVRDS is suitable for cognitive assessment/training. Practical implications are discussed for the application of HMDs and FSDs in evaluating and enhancing cognitive processing ability and the need for specific tailoring for male and female users.

[1]  James Brooks,et al.  Comparison of a Head-Mounted Display and Flat Screen Display during a Micro-UAV Target Detection Task , 2017 .

[2]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Immersion, Presence, Interactivity: Towards a Joint Understanding of Factors Influencing Virtual Reality Acceptance and Use , 2017, AMCIS.

[3]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Adamu Murtala Zungeru,et al.  Comparison of User Satisfaction between Text and Virtual Reality Based Expert Systems for Diagnosing Cattle Diseases , 2017 .

[5]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  T. Parsons,et al.  Bimodal Virtual Reality Stroop for Assessing Distractor Inhibition in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2016, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[8]  荒木孝昌,et al.  Head-mounted display , 2015 .

[9]  Matthew Rizzo,et al.  Cognitive Abilities Related to Driving Performance in a Simulator and Crashing on the Road , 2017 .

[10]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. , 1989, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  Christopher G. Courtney,et al.  Virtual reality Stroop task for assessment of supervisory attentional processing , 2013, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[12]  Michael D. Barnett,et al.  Virtual Apartment-Based Stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in healthy aging , 2019, Applied neuropsychology. Adult.

[13]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[14]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[15]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Interactions Between Threat and Executive Control in a Virtual Reality Stroop Task , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[16]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Pedro Gamito,et al.  Virtual exercises to promote cognitive recovery in stroke patients: the comparison between head mounted displays versus screen exposure methods , 2014 .

[20]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Jaewoo Chung,et al.  Mindful navigation for pedestrians: Improving engagement with augmented reality , 2016 .

[22]  Pierre Nolin,et al.  Assessment of executive function in adolescence: A comparison of traditional and virtual reality tools , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Sven C. Mueller,et al.  Gender differences in spatial navigation in virtual space: implications when using virtual environments in instruction and assessment , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[24]  Jih-Hsuan Lin,et al.  "Just Dance": The Effects of Exergame Feedback and Controller Use on Physical Activity and Psychological Outcomes. , 2015, Games for health journal.

[25]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[26]  Shih-Ching Yeh,et al.  Motion controllers for learners to manipulate and interact with 3D objects for mental rotation training , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  Mel Slater,et al.  Depth of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Initial Validation of a Virtual Environment for Assessment of Memory Functioning: Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[30]  J. Porter,et al.  Increasing the Distance of an External Focus of Attention Enhances Standing Long Jump Performance , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[31]  Nikolaos Pellas,et al.  The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Shih-Ching Yeh,et al.  The Effects of Immersion and Interactivity on College Students’ Acceptance of a Novel VR-Supported Educational Technology for Mental Rotation , 2018, IEEE Access.

[33]  Ying-Feng Kuo,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Bia Kim,et al.  Gender Differences in Spatial Navigation , 2007 .

[35]  Shih-Ching Yeh,et al.  The Introduction of a Novel Virtual Reality Training System for Gynecology Learning and Its User Experience Research , 2019, IEEE Access.

[36]  Michael D. Barnett,et al.  Virtual apartment stroop task: Comparison with computerized and traditional stroop tasks , 2018, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .