Applying Optimized Support Vector Regression Models for Prediction of Tunnel Boring Machine Performance

One of the main factors in the effective application of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) is the ability to accurately estimate the machine performance in order to determine the project costs and schedule. Predicting the TBM performance is a nonlinear and multivariable complex problem. The aim of this study is to predict the performance of TBM using the hybrid of support vector regression (SVR) and the differential evolution algorithm (DE), artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC), and gravitational search algorithm (GSA). The DE, ABC and GSA are combined with the SVR for determining the optimal value of its user defined parameters. The optimization implementation by the DE, ABC and GSA significantly improves the generalization ability of the SVR. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), average distance between planes of weakness (DPW), the angle between tunnel axis and the planes of weakness (α), and intact rock brittleness (BI) were considered as the input parameters, while the rate of penetration was the output parameter. The prediction models were applied to the available data given in the literature, and their performance was assessed based on statistical criteria. The results clearly show the superiority of DE when integrated with SVR for optimizing values of its parameters. In addition, the suggested model was compared with the methods previously presented for predicting the TBM penetration rate. The comparative results revealed that the hybrid of DE and SVR yields a robust model which outperforms other models in terms of the higher correlation coefficient and lower mean squared error.

[1]  Jianjun Wang,et al.  An annual load forecasting model based on support vector regression with differential evolution algorithm , 2012 .

[2]  Ebrahim Farrokh,et al.  Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs , 2012 .

[3]  Matteo Berti,et al.  TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications , 2002 .

[4]  Saffet Yagiz,et al.  Assessment of brittleness using rock strength and density with punch penetration test , 2009 .

[5]  G. L. Dollinger,et al.  Use of the punch test for estimating TBM performance , 1998 .

[6]  Jian Zhao,et al.  A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning , 2011 .

[7]  P J Tarkoy PREDICTING TUNNEL BORING MACHINE (TBM) PENETRATION RATES AND CUTTER COSTS IN SELECTED ROCK TYPES , 1974 .

[8]  H. Wanner,et al.  On the influence of geological conditions at the application of tunnel boring machines , 1975 .

[9]  K Gehring Der Einfluss von TBM-Konstruktion und Maschineneigenschaften auf Leistung und Werkzeugverbrauch in Gestein / The influence of TBM design and machine features on performance and tool wear in rock , 2009 .

[10]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  Facing the classification of binary problems with a GSA-SVM hybrid system , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[11]  M. Monjezi,et al.  Study of the influence of geotechnical parameters on the TBM performance in Tehran–Shomal highway project using ANN and SPSS , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[12]  Halil Karahan,et al.  Prediction of hard rock TBM penetration rate using particle swarm optimization , 2011 .

[13]  Saeid Saryazdi,et al.  Allocation of Static Var Compensator Using Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2007 .

[14]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  R. Ribacchi,et al.  Influence of Rock Mass Parameters on the Performance of a TBM in a Gneissic Formation (Varzo Tunnel) , 2005 .

[16]  Ebru Akcapinar Sezer,et al.  Application of two non-linear prediction tools to the estimation of tunnel boring machine performance , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  S. Yagiz Development of rock fracture and brittleness indices to quantify the effects of rock mass features and toughness in the CSM model basic penetration for hard rock tunneling machines. PhD Dissertation, T-5605, Colorado School of Mines, USA , 2002 .

[18]  Saffet Yagiz,et al.  Utilizing rock mass properties for predicting TBM performance in hard rock condition , 2008 .

[19]  We Bamford,et al.  Rock Test Indices are Being Successfully Correlated with Tunnel Boring Machine Performance , 1984 .

[20]  O. Acaroglu,et al.  A fuzzy logic model to predict specific energy requirement for TBM performance prediction , 2008 .

[21]  Weiping Zhang,et al.  Forecasting of turbine heat rate with online least squares support vector machine based on gravitational search algorithm , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[22]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces , 2004 .

[23]  N. Innaurato,et al.  POWER CONSUMPTION AND METAL WEAR IN TUNNEL-BORING MACHINES: ANALYSIS OF TUNNEL-BORING OPERATION IN HARD ROCK , 1983 .

[24]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Predicting penetration rate of hard rock tunnel boring machine using fuzzy logic , 2014, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[25]  D. Karaboga,et al.  On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[26]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[27]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  A support vector regression model for predicting tunnel boring machine penetration rates , 2014 .

[28]  Jun Wang,et al.  A real time IDSs based on artificial Bee Colony-support vector machine algorithm , 2010, Third International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence.

[29]  Junjie Li,et al.  Structural inverse analysis by hybrid simplex artificial bee colony algorithms , 2009 .

[30]  Zhiye Zhao,et al.  Prediction model of tunnel boring machine performance by ensemble neural networks , 2007 .

[31]  Jianzhong Zhou,et al.  Parameters identification of hydraulic turbine governing system using improved gravitational search algorithm , 2011 .

[32]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  Filter modeling using gravitational search algorithm , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[33]  Xiangtao Li,et al.  A novel hybrid K-harmonic means and gravitational search algorithm approach for clustering , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Mohammad Ali Ebrahimi Farsangi,et al.  Application of the Risk Matrix Method for Geotechnical Risk Analysis and Prediction of the Advance Rate in Rock TBM Tunneling , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[35]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[36]  J. Rostami,et al.  A New Model for Performance Prediction of Hard Rock Tbms , 1997 .

[37]  H. P. Sanio,et al.  Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock , 1985 .

[38]  Jamal Rostami,et al.  Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: a case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel , 2009 .

[39]  K. Shahriar,et al.  Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system , 2010 .

[40]  Dimitris Kaliampakos,et al.  Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks , 2004 .

[41]  Nick Barton,et al.  TBM Tunnelling in Jointed and Faulted Rock , 2000 .

[42]  Amund Bruland,et al.  HARD ROCK TUNNEL BORING , 2000 .

[43]  Dimitris Kaliampakos,et al.  A methodology for assessing geotechnical hazards for TBM tunnelling - Illustrated by the Athens Metro, Greece , 2004 .

[44]  Alok Singh,et al.  An artificial bee colony algorithm for the leaf-constrained minimum spanning tree problem , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[45]  M. Alvarez Grima,et al.  Modeling tunnel boring machine performance by neuro-fuzzy methods , 2000 .