Do erupted third molars weaken the mandibular angle after trauma to the chin region? A 3D finite element study.

It has been suggested that third molars increase mandibular fragility because they do not contribute to its strength. For ethical reasons, a human study design that would permit the elucidation of this interference is not possible. This study evaluated the impact of the presence of erupted third molars on the mandibular angle of resistance when submitted to trauma. A three-dimensional (3D) mandibular model was obtained through finite element methodology using computed tomography (CT) with the geometry and mechanical properties to reproduce a normal mandibular structure. Human mandibles with no, one or two erupted third molars were evaluated. Whenever the third molar was present there was a greater concentration of tensions around the cervical part of its alveolus. Approximated Von Mises equivalent stress of the third molar region was 107.035 MPa in the mandible with teeth and 64.6948 MPa in the mandible without teeth. In the condylar region it was 151.65 MPa when the third molar was present and 184.496 MPa when it was absent. The digital models created proved that the mandibular angle becomes more fragile in the presence of third molars. When they are absent the energy concentrates on the lateral e posterior aspect of the condylar neck.

[1]  P. Cleaton-jones,et al.  Experimental fractures of monkey mandibles. , 1978, International journal of oral surgery.

[2]  F. Oginni,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between mandibular third molars and angle fractures in Nigerians. , 2000, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  Deok-Won Lee,et al.  Effect of Lower Third Molars on the Incidence of Mandibular Angle and Condylar Fractures , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  J. Jansen,et al.  Review of biomechanical models used in studying the biomechanics of reconstructed mandibles. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[5]  P. Maurer,et al.  Study by finite element method of the mechanical stress of selected biodegradable osteosynthesis screws in sagittal ramus osteotomy. , 2002, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  F. Costa,et al.  Do third molars weaken the mandibular angle? , 2011, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[7]  Peter D. Waite,et al.  Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2011 .

[8]  J. J. S. M. Neto,et al.  Finite element analysis applied to dentoalveolar trauma: methodology description. , 2011 .

[9]  Jinxiang Dong,et al.  Anisotropic finite element modeling for patient-specific mandible , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[10]  J. Libersa,et al.  Immediate and late mandibular fractures after third molar removal. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[11]  U. Joos,et al.  Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[12]  T. Dodson,et al.  Mandibular third molars and angle fractures. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  J. Mühling,et al.  Relationship between the risk of mandibular angle fractures and the status of incompletely erupted mandibular third molars. , 2005, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[14]  G. Sándor,et al.  Impacted third molars and risk of angle fracture. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  J. Ma'aita,et al.  Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for mandibular angle fracture? , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[16]  S. Carneiro,et al.  Relationship between mandibular fracture and impacted lower third molar. , 2009, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[17]  P. Bujtár,et al.  Finite element analysis of the human mandible to assess the effect of removing an impacted third molar. , 2010, Journal.

[18]  D. Duan,et al.  Does the presence of mandibular third molars increase the risk of angle fracture and simultaneously decrease the risk of condylar fracture? , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  André Wilson Machado,et al.  Aplicabilidade científica do método dos elementos finitos , 2006 .

[20]  Attila Bojtos,et al.  Finite element analysis of the human mandible at 3 different stages of life. , 2010, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[21]  José R. Fernández,et al.  A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations. , 2004, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[22]  D. Huelke,et al.  Maxillofacial injuries: their nature and mechanisms of production. , 1969, Journal of oral surgery.

[23]  R. Rudderman,et al.  Biomechanics of the facial skeleton. , 1992, Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

[24]  M J Fagan,et al.  Validating a voxel-based finite element model of a human mandible using digital speckle pattern interferometry. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  F. I. da Silva,et al.  Finite Element Analysis Applied to Dentoalveolar Trauma: Methodology Description , 2011, ISRN dentistry.