A Practical, Automated Quality Assurance Method for Measuring Spatial Resolution in PET

The use of different scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms has been identified as a problem that limits the use of PET in multicenter trials. The aim of this project was to aid standardization of data collection by developing a quality assurance method for measuring the spatial resolution achieved with clinical imaging protocols. Methods: A commercially available 68Ge cylinder phantom (diameter, 20 cm) with a uniform activity concentration was positioned in the center of the PET field of view, and an image was acquired using typical clinical parameters. Spatial resolution was measured by artificially generating an object function (O) with uniform activity within a 20-cm-diameter cylinder, assuming no noise and perfect spatial resolution, centered on the original image (I); dividing F[I] by F[O], where F indicates a 2-dimensional Fourier transform, to produce a modulation transfer function; and taking the inverse Fourier transform of the modulation transfer function to produce a point-spread function in image space. The method was validated using data acquired on 4 different commercial PET systems. Results: Spatial resolution on the Discovery LS was measured at 5.75 ± 0.58 mm, compared with 5.54 ± 0.19 mm from separate point source measurements. Variability of the resolution measurements differed between scanners and protocols, but the typical SD was approximately 0.15 mm when iterative reconstruction was used. The potential for predicting resolution recovery coefficients for small objects was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The proposed method does not require elaborate phantom preparation and is practical to perform, and data analysis is fully automated. This approach is useful for evaluating clinical reconstruction protocols across varying scanners and reconstruction algorithms and should greatly aid standardization of data collection between centers.

[1]  J. Machac,et al.  Instrumentation quality assurance and performance , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  Lefteris Livieratos,et al.  A dual modality approach to quantitative quality control in emission tomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[4]  J. R. Prince,et al.  Transfer function measurement and analysis for a magnetic resonance imager. , 1991, Medical physics.

[5]  Val J Lowe,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Barry A. Siegel,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of axillary nodal staging by positron emission tomography in breast cancer: a report of the staging breast cancer with PET Study Group. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Investigation of the performance of the General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph in 3D mode , 1995 .

[8]  S C Strother,et al.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  The American College Of Radiology Imaging Network--clinical trials of diagnostic imaging and image-guided treatment. , 2008, Seminars in oncology.

[11]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[12]  S. Bull,et al.  Gamma camera MTFs from edge response function measurements. , 1983, Medical physics.

[13]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[14]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[15]  T G Turkington,et al.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.