Perspectives on the Implementation of FAIR Principles in Solid Earth Research Infrastructures

FAIR principles have become reference criteria for promoting and evaluating openness of scientific data and for improving datasets Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability. This also applies to Research Infrastructures (RIs) in the solid Earth domain committed to provide access to seismological data, ground deformations inferred from terrestrial, and satellite observations, geological maps, and laboratory experiments. Such RIs have been indeed committed for a long time, well before the appearance of FAIR principles, to engage scientific communities involved in data collection, standardization, and quality control as well as in implementing metadata and services for qualification, storage and accessibility. By addressing open science and managing scientific data, they are working to adopt FAIR principles, thus having the onerous task of turning these principles into practices. In this work we argue that although FAIR principles have the merit of creating a common background of knowledge to engage communities in providing data in a standard way thus easing interoperability and data sharing, in order to make the adoption of FAIR principles less onerous there is an urgent need of clear models, reference architectures and technical guidelines which can support RI implementers in the realization of FAIR data provision systems. We therefore discuss the state of the art of FAIR principles ecosystem and open new perspectives by discussing a four-stages roadmap that reorganizes FAIR principles in a way that better fits to the approach of RI implementers, and a FAIR adoption process that relates FAIR principles to technologies for their implementation.

[1]  Malcolm P. Atkinson,et al.  dispel4py: An Agile Framework for Data-Intensive eScience , 2015, 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on e-Science.

[2]  Keith G. Jeffery,et al.  EPOS: A Novel Use of CERIF for Data-intensive Science , 2014, CRIS.

[3]  Erik Schultes,et al.  Ready, Set, GO FAIR: Accelerating Convergence to an Internet of FAIR Data and Services , 2018, DAMDID/RCDL.

[4]  A. H. Ball,et al.  Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models , 2012 .

[5]  Erik Schultes,et al.  Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, community-governed framework , 2019, Scientific Data.

[6]  Keith G. Jeffery,et al.  Interoperability Oriented Architecture: The Approach of EPOS for Solid Earth e-Infrastructures , 2015, 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on e-Science.

[7]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Decentralized Persistent Identifiers: a basic model for immutable handlers , 2018, CRIS.

[8]  Chris Mungall,et al.  The environment ontology in 2016: bridging domains with increased scope, semantic density, and interoperation , 2016, Journal of Biomedical Semantics.

[9]  Emes,et al.  Systems engineering management , 2004 .

[10]  Ruben Verborgh,et al.  Interoperability and FAIRness through a novel combination of Web technologies , 2017, PeerJ Prepr..

[11]  Zhiming Zhao,et al.  ENVRI-FAIR - Interoperable Environmental FAIR Data and Services for Society, Innovation and Research , 2019, 2019 15th International Conference on eScience (eScience).

[12]  John Sidney,et al.  An ontology for major histocompatibility restriction , 2016, Journal of Biomedical Semantics.

[13]  Werner Gurtner,et al.  RINEX - The Receiver Independent Exchange Format - Version 3.00 , 2007 .

[14]  Malcolm P. Atkinson,et al.  Establishing Core Concepts for Information-Powered Collaborations , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[15]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[16]  Jan Brase,et al.  DataCite - A Global Registration Agency for Research Data , 2009, 2009 Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology.

[17]  Massimiliano Izzo,et al.  FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Michel Dumontier,et al.  A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness , 2017, Scientific Data.

[19]  Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos,et al.  Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud , 2017, Inf. Serv. Use.

[20]  Annelien L Bredenoord,et al.  The FAIR guiding principles for data stewardship: fair enough? , 2018, European Journal of Human Genetics.