A Connectionist Account of Interference Effects in Early Infant Memory and Categorization

An unusual asymmetry has been observed in natural category formation in infants (Quinn, Eimas, and Rosenkrantz, 1993). Infants who are in itially exposed to a series of pictures of cats and then are shown a dog and a novel cat, show significantly more interest in the dog than in the cat. However, when the order of presentation is reversed — dogs are seen first, then a cat and a novel dog — the cat attracts no more attention than the dog. We show that a simple connectionist network can model this unexpected learning asymmetry and propose that this asymmetry arises naturally from the asymmetric overlaps of the feature distributions of the two categories. The values of the cat features are subsumed by those of dog features, but not vice-versa. The autoencoder used for the experiments presented in this paper also reproduces exclusivity effects in the two categories as well the reported effect of catastrophic interference of dogs on previously learned cats, but not vice-versa. The results of the modeling suggest connectionist methods are ideal for exploring early infant knowledge acquisition.

[1]  J. Deloache Rate of habituation and visual memory in infants. , 1976, Child development.

[2]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Interference and inhibition in cognition: An historical perspective , 1995 .

[3]  B. Hood,et al.  Shifts of visual attention in the human infant: a neuroscientific approach , 1995 .

[4]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Chapter 5 – Infant Visual Memory1 , 1975 .

[5]  P D Eimas,et al.  Development of exclusivity in perceptually based categories of young infants. , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception: From sensation to cognition , 1975 .

[7]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  Interference or facilitation in infant memory , 1995 .

[8]  David R. Shanks,et al.  CATEGORIZATION BY A CONNECTIONIST NETWORK , 1991 .

[9]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[10]  J.A. Anderson,et al.  Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. , 1984 .

[11]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[12]  The emergence of perceptual category representations during early development: A connectionist analysis , 1996 .

[13]  C. Dodds,et al.  The interfering effect of distracting stimuli on the infant's memory. , 1977, Child development.

[14]  B. Younger The segregation of items into categories by ten-month-old infants. , 1985, Child development.

[15]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Image compression by back-propagation: An example of extensional programming , 1988 .

[16]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Developing object permanence: A connectionist model , 1995 .

[17]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  A Two Process Model of Infant Visual Attention. , 1972 .

[18]  P. L. Harris Infant perception: From sensation to cognition L.B. Cohen & P. Salapatek. Academic Press, New York (1975). Vol. 1, 438 pp., £11.25 and Vol. 2, 256 pp., £8.75 , 1976, Neuroscience.

[19]  E. N. Solokov Perception and the conditioned reflex , 1963 .

[20]  A. Slater,et al.  Visual perception and memory at birth , 1995 .

[21]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .

[22]  Anthony V. Robins,et al.  Catastrophic Forgetting, Rehearsal and Pseudorehearsal , 1995, Connect. Sci..