Increasing Metacomprehension in Learning Disabled and Normally Achieving Students through Self-Questioning Training

This study investigated the hypothesis that insufficient metacomprehension is one possible cause underlying learning disabled adolescents' comprehension problems, and that training them to monitor their understanding of important textual elements fosters metacomprehension and, consequently, improves their comprehension performance. A total of 120 learning disabled eighth and ninth graders and normally achieving sixth graders participated in the study. Half the subjects were randomly assigned to receive a 5-step self-questioning training in which they learned to monitor their understanding of important textual units. The results clearly showed that training substantially increased learning disabled adolescents' awareness of important textual units, as well as their ability to formulate good questions involving those units. Moreover, training facilitated their comprehension performance. However, training did not substantially increase normally achieving sixth graders' metacomprehension or comprehension performance. The differential effects of training on the two groups of students underscore the inactive nature of the learning disabled adolescents' reading as opposed to the active nature of reading in normally achieving sixth graders.

[1]  G. A. Petersen,et al.  Spontaneous monitoring and regulation of learning: a comparison of successful and less successful fifth graders. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  The effect of mapping on the free recall of expository text , 1980 .

[3]  L. Baker,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions1 , 1979 .

[4]  E. Markman Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. , 1979, Child development.

[5]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  An Investigation of Lookbacks During Studying , 1979 .

[6]  B. Wong Increasing Retention of Main Ideas through Questioning Strategies , 1979 .

[7]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of strategies for studying texts. , 1978 .

[8]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  Another Look at the Self-Questioning Study Technique. Reading Education Report No. 6. , 1978 .

[9]  C. L. Hansen Story Retelling Used with Average and Learning Disabled Readers as a Measure of Reading Comprehension , 1978 .

[10]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The development of strategies for studying prose passages , 1977 .

[11]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Realizing That You Don't Understand: A Preliminary Investigation. , 1977 .

[12]  Sandra S. Smiley,et al.  Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation , 1977 .

[13]  J. Torgesen The Role of Nonspecific Factors in the Task Performance of Learning Disabled Children , 1977 .

[14]  E. Wiig,et al.  Language Disabilities in Children and Adolescents , 1976 .

[15]  Barry J. Schwartz,et al.  Effect of question production and answering on prose recall. , 1975 .

[16]  D. Knapczyk,et al.  The effects of prompting question-asking upon on-task behavior and reading comprehension. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  Susan A. Vogel,et al.  Syntactic Abilities in Normal and Dyslexic Children , 1974 .

[18]  D. Baer,et al.  Training two severely retarded adolescents to ask questions. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  T. H. Anderson,et al.  The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique , 1978 .

[20]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Skills, plans, and self-regulation , 1978 .

[21]  J. Flavell Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[22]  A. Ross Psychological aspects of learning disabilities & reading disorders , 1976 .

[23]  Anthony V. Manzo,et al.  The ReQuest Procedure. , 1969 .