Using "iDose4" iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults' chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine the effect of iDose4 hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) on radiation dose and image quality in chest–abdomen–pelvis (CAP) CT scanning of adult patients. METHODS CAP CT examinations were performed on 99 patients with the use of the “old standard” protocol performing filtered back projection reconstruction algorithm (FBP protocol) and on 84 patients with the use of iDose4 protocol on a 64-multidetector CT. Patients were subdivided into three weight groups (Group 1, 41–60kg; Group 2, 61–90kg; and Group 3, .90kg). Volume CT dose index and dose length product (DLP) were recorded, while effective dose was calculated from DLP measurements. Objective image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. Two radiologists reviewed images to evaluate image quality. RESULTS Compared with the FBP protocol, there was an overall 46.5% significant decrease in effective dose with the use of iDose4 protocol. CONCLUSION Objective image quality was higher in iDose4 images than in FBP images. Subjective image noise, sharpness, contrast and diagnostic confidence scores tended to be better for iDose4 protocol at the decreased radiation exposure level. Artefacts were minor for both protocols. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Our results suggest that the iterative acquisition protocol provides great potential for reducing radiation exposure and maintaining or improving image quality in CAP CT examinations.

[1]  M. L. Rosado de Christenson,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Pilot Study , 2012 .

[2]  Nils Dahlström,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  K. Buchan,et al.  Low dose CT chest - how low can we go? , 2012 .

[4]  Christian Stahl,et al.  Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography: Intraindividual Comparison of Image Quality of Full-Dose Standard and Half-Dose Iterative Reconstructions With Dual-Source Computed Tomography , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[5]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[7]  D. Spelic,et al.  Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  Hiroaki Sugiura,et al.  Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[9]  R. Nelson,et al.  Radiation dose for body CT protocols: variability of scanners at one institution. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lung: potential value of iterative reconstructions , 2012, European Radiology.

[12]  K. Davis,et al.  Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[13]  Ernst J Rummeny,et al.  Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Improvement of Image Quality at Low–Radiation Dose and Low–Contrast Material Dose Abdominal CT in Patients With Cirrhosis: Intraindividual Comparison of Low Tube Voltage With Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm and Standard Tube Voltage , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  A. Elster,et al.  Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog , 2010 .

[19]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.