A suborbital IMU test mission

This paper presents work conducted in preparation for a suborbital test flight to test an inertial measurement unit’s (IMU’s) ability to serve as a position determination mechanism in a GPS-denied environment. Because the IMU could potentially be used at several points during flight, it is not guaranteed that a GPS fix can be used to reset the IMU after the stresses of launch. Due to this, the specific goal of this work is to characterize whether a rocket launch disrupts the IMU-based position knowledge to the extent that it is unusable. This paper discusses preparations for a sub-orbital launch mission to this end. It include a description of the hardware and software used. A discussion of the data logging mechanism and the onboard and post-flight processing which is required to compare the GPS fixes and IMU-generated positions is also presented. Finally, the utility of an IMU capable of maintaining position awareness during launch is discussed.

[1]  Michael Swartwout.  The Long-Threatened Flood of University-Class Spacecraft (and CubeSats) Has Come: Analyzing the Numbers , 2013 .

[2]  Jeremy Straub.  The OpenOrbiter Program: Intrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship and Innovation , 2013 .

[3]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Extending the Student Qualitative Undertaking Involvement Risk Model , 2014 .

[4]  Jeremy Straub.  Increasing National Space Engineering Productivity and Educational Opportunities via Intrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship and Innovation , 2013 .

[5]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Student Expectations from Participating in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2013 .

[6]  Jeremy Straub.  CubeSats: A Low-Cost, Very High-Return Space Technology , 2012 .

[7]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  The open prototype for educational NanoSats: Fixing the other side of the small satellite cost equation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Evaluation of the Educational Impact of Participation Time in a Small Spacecraft Development Program , 2014 .

[9]  David J. Weeks,et al.  The First US Army Satellite in Fifty Years: SMDC-ONE First Flight Results , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Taraba,et al.  Boeing's CubeSat TestBed 1 Attitude Determination Design and On­Orbit Experience , 2009 .

[11]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  An Assessment of Educational Benefits from the OpenOrbiter Space Program , 2013 .

[12]  Andrew E. Kalman,et al.  A Novel Hemispherical Anti-Twist Tracking System (HATTS) for CubeSats , 2012 .

[13]  Roland Coelho,et al.  ELaNa – Educational Launch of Nanosatellite: Providing Routine RideShare Opportunities , 2012 .

[14]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  OpenOrbiter: A Low-Cost, Educational Prototype CubeSat Mission Architecture , 2013 .

[15]  Robert J. Twiggs,et al.  Thinking Out of the Box : Space Science Beyond the CubeSat , 2012 .

[16]  Michael Swartwout,et al.  The First One Hundred CubeSats: A Statistical Look , 2013 .

[17]  Pekka Kangaslahti,et al.  CubeSat Constellation for Atmospheric Temperature and Humidity Sounding , 2013 .

[18]  K. Coste,et al.  A Cold Gas Micro-Propulsion System for CubeSats , 2003 .

[19]  Jeremy Bailey,et al.  A CubeSat Mission for Exoplanet Transit Detection and Asteroseismology , 2012 .

[20]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Risk Analysis & Management in Student-Centered Spacecraft Development Projects , 2013 .

[21]  Albert Tsuda,et al.  Rapid Development using Tyvak’s Open Source Software Model , 2013 .

[22]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Do we have an ITAR Problem: A Review of the Implications of ITAR and Title VII on Small Satellite Programs , 2013 .

[23]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  A Review of Online Collaboration Tools Used by the UND OpenOrbiter Program , 2013 .

[24]  Michael Swartwout.  Secondary payloads in 2014: Assessing the numbers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.