Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 3. Blind validation for internal and outlet responses

Abstract The capability of the physically based, distributed SHETRAN catchment modelling system for predictive modelling of hypothetical future catchments is validated for the 0.94 km 2 Slapton Wood catchment in southwest England. A ‘blind’ procedure (without sight of measured response data) is used which accounts also for uncertainty in model parameter evaluation. Internal catchment conditions as well as the outlet discharge are considered, making the test perhaps the severest to which a model can be subjected. Data collection formed an integral part of the validation procedure and was designed specifically to satisfy the needs of the modelling component. The extensive dataset which was collected included rainfall, evapotranspiration, soil property data, channel geometry, phreatic surface elevation, soil water potential and stream discharge. Following a prescribed method, blind predictions were made of ten features of the phreatic surface, soil water potential and surface runoff responses. Output uncertainty bounds were determined as a function of uncertainty in the model parameter values. Subsequent comparison of the bounds with the measured data showed that eight of the ten predictions passed the specified success criteria, constituting a successful validation. Within reasonable uncertainty bounds, and on a spatially distributed basis, SHETRAN is shown able to represent the annual catchment water balance as well as important features of the event-scale response. The results are an encouraging demonstration of the fitness of such models for predictive modelling.

[1]  John N. Quinton.  Reducing predictive uncertainty in model simulations: a comparison of two methods using the European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM) , 1997 .

[2]  John Ewen,et al.  VALIDATION OF CATCHMENT MODELS FOR PREDICTING LAND-USE AND CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS. : 2. CASE STUDY FOR A MEDITERRANEAN CATCHMENT , 1996 .

[3]  J. Refsgaard.  Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[4]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[5]  J. D. Cooper,et al.  Variability of unsaturated zone water transport parameters: implications for hydrological modelling. 1. In situ measurements , 1993 .

[6]  John Ewen,et al.  Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 1. Method , 1996 .

[7]  Edwin T. Engman,et al.  Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff , 1983 .

[8]  K. Beven,et al.  On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: The incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process , 1998 .

[9]  John Ewen,et al.  SHETRAN: Distributed River Basin Flow and Transport Modeling System , 2000 .

[10]  W. Rawls,et al.  Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture , 1986 .

[11]  Jan Feyen,et al.  Constraining soil hydraulic parameter and output uncertainty of the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model using the GLUE framework , 2002 .

[12]  B. Ambroise,et al.  Multicriterion Validation of a Semidistributed Conceptual Model of the Water Cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France) , 1995 .

[13]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE‐SHE code , 2002 .

[14]  Penny J Johnes,et al.  MODELLING THE IMPACT OF LAND USE CHANGE ON WATER QUALITY IN AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENTS , 1997 .

[15]  R. A. Hiley,et al.  Test of the SHETRAN technology for modelling the impact of reforestation on badlands runoff and sediment yield at Draix, France , 2000 .

[16]  L. Feyen,et al.  Application of a distributed physically-based hydrological model to a medium size catchment , 2000 .

[17]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Multi‐criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment , 1999 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  On constraining TOPMODEL hydrograph simulations using partial saturated area information , 2002 .

[19]  P. Llorens,et al.  Internal evaluation of a physically-based distributed model using data from a Mediterranean mountain catchment , 2002 .

[20]  James C. Bathurst,et al.  Physically-based distributed modelling of an upland catchment using the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen , 1986 .

[21]  J. M. Wicks,et al.  Calibrating SHE soil-erosion model for different land covers , 1992 .

[22]  Tim Burt,et al.  Topographic controls of soil moisture distributions , 1985 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[24]  Francesc Gallart,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and multi‐response, multi‐criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model , 2002 .

[25]  M. Thorne,et al.  Validation of a physically based catchment model for application in post-closure radiological safety assessments of deep geological repositories for solid radioactive wastes , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[26]  T. Burt,et al.  The natural history of Slapton Ley nature reserve. XV: Hydrological processes in the Slapton Wood catchment , 1983 .

[27]  Göran Lindström,et al.  Multi‐variable parameter estimation to increase confidence in hydrological modelling , 2002 .

[28]  S. Trudgill,et al.  Solute modelling in catchment systems , 1995 .

[29]  R. Raga,et al.  Variability of unsaturated zone water transport parameters: implications for hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[30]  S. T. Trudgill,et al.  The natural history of Slapton Ley nature reserve. XVI. The soils of Slapton Wood , 1983 .

[31]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives , 2003 .

[32]  P. E. O'Connell,et al.  Future of distributed modelling: The Systeme Hydrologique Europeen , 1992 .