Coupling Artificial Intelligence Capability and Strategic Agility for Enhanced Product and Service Creativity

Creativity is key for organizations’ ability to remain relevant in today's disruptive world. In this paper, we identify new ways in which organizations can use artificial intelligence (AI) more effectively for creativity. Drawing on the resource‐based view as a background mechanism, we developed and empirically tested a new integrative model. We collected the research data via a large survey of managers distributed to 600 organizations in China. Our findings show that coupling AI capability with strategic agility can directly support creativity. It also mediates the effects of ambidexterity, customer orientation and competitor orientation on organizations’ creativity and performance when developing new products and services. In addition, our findings show that coupling AI capability and strategic agility can significantly improve firms’ new product creativity and new service development performance when there is a high level of government institutional support. Our findings provide theoretical and practical implications for academics and practitioners interested in managing AI for organizational creativity.

[1]  Junsheng Dou,et al.  Is organizational ambidexterity always beneficial to family-managed SMEs? Evidence from China , 2023, Journal of Business Research.

[2]  Saqib Shamim,et al.  Mechanisms of cognitive trust development in artificial intelligence among front line employees: An empirical examination from a developing economy , 2023, Journal of Business Research.

[3]  Fengwen Chen,et al.  What Changes and Opportunities Does Big Data Analytics Capability Bring to Strategic Alliance Research? A Systematic Literature Review , 2023, International Journal of Management Reviews.

[4]  Margherita Pagani,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for Business Creativity , 2023 .

[5]  K. Zhou,et al.  Technological capability strength/asymmetry and supply chain process innovation: The contingent roles of institutional environments , 2023, Research Policy.

[6]  Francesco Venturini,et al.  The determinants of AI innovation across European firms , 2023, Research Policy.

[7]  S. Tarba,et al.  Strategic agility in international business , 2023, Journal of World Business.

[8]  Nadia Zahoor,et al.  Grand Challenges and Emerging Market SMEs : The Role of Strategic Agility and Gender Diversity , 2023, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[9]  Jayesh D. Patel,et al.  Creativity in marketing: Examining the intellectual structure using scientometric analysis and topic modeling , 2023, Journal of Business Research.

[10]  K. Mai,et al.  Understanding the effects of cheating configurations on team creative performance: A social impact theory perspective , 2022, Personnel Psychology.

[11]  Prokriti Mukherji,et al.  Same, same but different! New service development in the context of emerging markets: a review , 2022, International Marketing Review.

[12]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance , 2022, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[13]  K. Au,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Metropolis: Education and Policy Implications in Hong Kong , 2022, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[14]  Ritika Chopra,et al.  Toward advancing theory on creativity in marketing and artificial intelligence , 2022, Psychology & Marketing.

[15]  Janell D. Townsend,et al.  Completing the market orientation matrix: The impact of proactive competitor orientation on innovation and firm performance , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.

[16]  Christian Homburg,et al.  The value relevance of digital marketing capabilities to firm performance , 2022, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[17]  Pierre Dussauge,et al.  Intellectual property rights, non-market considerations and foreign R&D investments , 2022, Research Policy.

[18]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage , 2022, Strategic Management Journal.

[19]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Interplay of policy experimentation and institutional change in sustainability transitions: The case of mobility as a service in Finland , 2022, Research Policy.

[20]  S. Akter,et al.  How data-driven innovation capability is shaping the future of market agility and competitive performance? , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[21]  B. Lundvall,et al.  China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems , 2022, Research Policy.

[22]  Sang-Do Park.  Policy Discourse Among the Chinese Public on Initiatives for Cultural and Creative Industries: Text Mining Analysis , 2022, SAGE Open.

[23]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Paradoxical Leadership, Subjective Ambivalence, and Employee Creativity: Effects of Employee Holistic Thinking , 2021, Journal of Management Studies.

[24]  W. Reinartz,et al.  Examining Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technologies in Marketing Via a Global Lens: Current Trends and Future Research Opportunities , 2021, International Journal of Research in Marketing.

[25]  Dana E. Harrison,et al.  Data Quality Assurance Begins Before Data Collection and Never Ends: What Marketing Researchers Absolutely Need to Remember , 2021, International Journal of Market Research.

[26]  Usama Awan,et al.  The Role of Big Data Analytics in Manufacturing Agility and Performance: Moderation–Mediation Analysis of Organizational Creativity and of the Involvement of Customers as Data Analysts , 2021, British Journal of Management.

[27]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Artificial intelligence as an enabler of B2B marketing: A dynamic capabilities micro-foundations approach , 2021 .

[28]  Nidthida Lin,et al.  Innovative idea generation in problem finding: Abductive reasoning, cognitive impediments and the promise of Artificial Intelligence , 2021, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[29]  Farid Shirazi,et al.  New product success through big data analytics: an empirical evidence from Iran , 2021, Inf. Technol. People.

[30]  Marcello M. Mariani,et al.  How to Build an AI Climate-Driven Service Analytics Capability for Innovation and Performance in Industrial Markets? , 2021, Industrial Marketing Management.

[31]  Claudio Dell'Era,et al.  Enlightening the dynamic capabilities of design thinking in fostering digital transformation , 2021, Industrial Marketing Management.

[32]  W. Wales,et al.  Stemming the downturn: How ambidexterity and public policy influence firm performance stability during economic crises , 2021 .

[33]  Ilse Maria Beuren,et al.  Fostering individual creativity in startups: comprehensive performance measurement systems, role clarity and strategic flexibility , 2021 .

[34]  Bjørn-Tore Flåten,et al.  Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[35]  Antonio Carlos Gastaud Maçada,et al.  Competitive advantage of data-driven analytical capabilities: the role of big data visualization and of organizational agility , 2021 .

[36]  Mayoor Mohan,et al.  Another day, another chance: Daily workplace experiences and their impact on creativity , 2021 .

[37]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance , 2021, Inf. Manag..

[38]  D. Hoonsopon,et al.  Cultivating product innovation performance through creativity: the impact of organizational agility and flexibility under technological turbulence , 2021 .

[39]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  A Framework for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing , 2021 .

[40]  Marinko Škare,et al.  A dynamic panel study on digitalization and firm's agility: What drives agility in advanced economies 2009–2018 , 2021 .

[41]  Michael Murphree,et al.  The more the merrier? Chinese government R&D subsidies, dependence, and firm innovation performance , 2021 .

[42]  U. Gretzel,et al.  Commentary: Artificial Intelligence: The Marketer’s Dilemma , 2021 .

[43]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  A Self‐Tuning Model for Smart Manufacturing SMEs: Effects on Digital Innovation , 2020 .

[44]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing , 2020, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[45]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  A microfoundational perspective of organizational ambidexterity: Critical review and research directions , 2020 .

[46]  Huda Khan.  Is marketing agility important for emerging market firms in advanced markets? , 2020 .

[47]  Gabriele Piccoli,et al.  "What can I(S) do for you?": How technology enables service providers to elicit customers' preferences and deliver personalized service , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Scott B. Dust,et al.  Leader–follower risk orientation incongruence, intellectual stimulation, and creativity: A configurational approach , 2020 .

[49]  M. Hamsal,et al.  The impact of balanced agile project management on firm performance: the mediating role of market orientation and strategic agility , 2020 .

[50]  S. Carter,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Venture Creation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2020, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

[51]  Cewu Lu,et al.  Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[52]  H. Ting,et al.  Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM , 2020, Tourism Economics.

[53]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  What explains the performance of community-based initiatives? Testing the impact of leadership, social capital, organizational capacity, and government support , 2020, Public Management Review.

[54]  Waqar Nadeem,et al.  Understanding market agility for new product success with big data analytics , 2020 .

[55]  Paul S. Hempel,et al.  Tough Love and Creativity: How Authoritarian Leadership Tempered by Benevolence or Morality Influences Employee Creativity , 2020 .

[56]  Lirong R. Long,et al.  Different roles of shared and vertical leadership in promoting team creativity: Cultivating and synthesizing team members’ individual creativity , 2020, Personnel Psychology.

[57]  Anastasia A. Katou,et al.  A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes , 2020 .

[58]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Strategic agility in international business: A conceptual framework for “agile” multinationals , 2020 .

[59]  P. Andreou,et al.  Measuring Firms’ Market Orientation Using Textual Analysis of 10‐K Filings , 2020 .

[60]  G. Cao,et al.  The impact of aligning business, IT, and marketing strategies on firm performance , 2020, Industrial Marketing Management.

[61]  Ismail Gölgeci,et al.  How do agile organizations contribute to environmental collaboration? Evidence from MNEs in Turkey , 2019 .

[62]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy , 2019, International Journal of Information Management.

[63]  Danupol Hoonsopon,et al.  Organizational Agility: Key to the Success of New Product Development , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[64]  Niklas Kühl,et al.  Supporting customer-oriented marketing with artificial intelligence: automatically quantifying customer needs from social media , 2019, Electronic Markets.

[65]  Karl S.R. Warner,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[66]  D. Clercq,et al.  Government institutional support, entrepreneurial orientation, strategic renewal, and firm performance in transitional China , 2019, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.

[67]  John F. Mahon,et al.  Management Innovation in a VUCA World: Challenges and Recommendations , 2018, California Management Review.

[68]  S. Kraus,et al.  Family Firm Configurations for High Performance: The Role of Entrepreneurship and Ambidexterity , 2018 .

[69]  José Alcides Gobbo Junior,et al.  Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation , 2018, Technovation.

[70]  Brent Kitchens,et al.  Advanced Customer Analytics: Strategic Value Through Integration of Relationship-Oriented Big Data , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[72]  Michael J. Arena,et al.  Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework , 2018 .

[73]  D. Cyranoski.  China enters the battle for AI talent , 2018, Nature.

[74]  David J. Teece,et al.  Business models and dynamic capabilities , 2017 .

[75]  Jan‐Erik Vahlne,et al.  Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA , 2017 .

[76]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy , 2016 .

[77]  D. Griffith,et al.  New Product Creativity: Understanding Contract Specificity in New Product Introductions , 2016 .

[78]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Guest Editors’ Introduction: The Role of Human Resources and Organizational Factors in Ambidexterity , 2015 .

[79]  Yaakov Weber,et al.  The Role of Strategic Agility in Acquisitions , 2015 .

[80]  Jaeki Song,et al.  Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach , 2015, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[81]  Chengli Shu,et al.  Firm patenting, innovations, and government institutional support as a double-edged sword , 2015 .

[82]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s , 2015 .

[83]  Yaakov Weber,et al.  Strategic Agility: A State of the Art Introduction to the Special Section on Strategic Agility , 2014 .

[84]  Yi Wang,et al.  IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .

[86]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Understanding Diversity Management Practices: Implications of Institutional Theory and Resource-Based Theory , 2011 .

[87]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Business and Political Ties on Firm Performance: Evidence from China , 2011 .

[88]  Subin Im,et al.  Testing interaction effects of the dimensions of market orientation on marketing program creativity , 2008 .

[89]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[90]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  Towards Theory Building in Agile Manufacturing Strategy—A Taxonomical Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[91]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[92]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[93]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  How the Resource‐based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate‐level Strategy , 2003 .

[94]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[95]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[96]  Z. Zhang,et al.  A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations , 2000 .

[97]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[98]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[99]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[100]  Won‐Moo Hur,et al.  Customer showrooming behavior, customer orientation, and emotional labor: Sales control as a moderator , 2023, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[101]  M. Spring,et al.  Facilitating public procurement of innovation in the UK defence and health sectors: Innovation intermediaries as institutional entrepreneurs , 2023, Research Policy.

[102]  C. Franco,et al.  Organizational drivers of innovation: The role of workforce agility , 2022, Research Policy.

[103]  S. Moghavvemi,et al.  Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries , 2022, Research Policy.

[104]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning , 2016 .

[105]  T. Cheng,et al.  Continuous improvement competence, employee creativity, and new service development performance: A frontline employee perspective , 2016 .

[106]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Creativity in Product Innovation Teams , 2013 .

[107]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .