Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison

Background: Road traffic deaths are a major global health and development problem. An understanding of the existing burden of road traffic deaths in the population is necessary for developing effective interventions. Objective: To outline systematically the global distribution of road traffic deaths by road user groups (pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, motorised four-wheeler occupants). Methods: Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, TransportLink, grey literature and reference lists and communication with experts from international organisations and country-level institutions were conducted to identify eligible studies and data sources. All data sources that provided a breakdown of road traffic deaths by road user group at the national or sub-national level were eligible for inclusion. A breakdown of road traffic deaths by road user group was constructed for 14 epidemiologically defined World Health Organization (WHO) sub-regions in addition to World Bank income categories. In addition, the total number of road traffic fatalities by road user group in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries was estimated. Results: The breakdown of road traffic deaths by road user group varies dramatically across epidemiological WHO sub-regions. The magnitude of pedestrian fatalities ranges from more than half in African sub-region AfrE (55%) to 15% or less in AmrA or EurA. The distribution also varies across low-income, middle-income and high-income countries. 45% of road traffic fatalities in low-income countries are among pedestrians, whereas an estimated 29% in middle-income and 18% in high-income countries are among pedestrians. The burden of road traffic injuries on vulnerable road users differs substantially across income levels. An estimated total of 227 835 pedestrians die in low-income countries, as opposed to 161 501 in middle-income countries and 22 500 in high-income countries each year. Conclusions: Ameliorating road safety requires the implementation of context-specific solutions. This review of the road traffic injury literature provides strong evidence that the distribution of road traffic fatalities varies dramatically across different parts of the world. Therefore, context-appropriate and effective prevention strategies that protect the particular at-risk road user groups should be carefully investigated.

[1]  A J Downing,et al.  Pedestrian accidents and road safety education in selected developing countries , 1996 .

[2]  Etienne G Krug,et al.  Injury surveillance is key to preventing injuries , 2004, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Mock,et al.  Using mortuary statistics in the development of an injury surveillance system in Ghana. , 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[4]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Economic development and traffic accident mortality in the industrialized world, 1962-1990. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  A. Hyder,et al.  Rates of public investment for road safety in developing countries: case studies of Uganda and Pakistan. , 2003, Health policy and planning.

[6]  V. Nantulya,et al.  KENYA: UNCOVERING THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS. IN: CHALLENGING INEQUITIES IN HEALTH: FROM ETHICS TO ACTION , 2001 .

[7]  Tim Evans,et al.  Road traffic crashes: operationalizing equity in the context of health sector reform , 2003, Injury control and safety promotion.

[8]  A. Hyder,et al.  Inequality and road-traffic injuries: call for action , 2003, The Lancet.

[9]  A A Hyder,et al.  Motor vehicle crashes in Pakistan: the emerging epidemic , 2000, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[10]  J. Barendregt,et al.  Global burden of disease , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Reich,et al.  Equity dimensions of road traffic injuries in low- and middle-income countries , 2003, Injury control and safety promotion.

[12]  Francis K Afukaar,et al.  Pattern of road traffic injuries in Ghana: Implications for control , 2003, Injury control and safety promotion.

[13]  Trudy A. Karlson,et al.  Injury control and public policy , 1992 .

[14]  R. Norton,et al.  Road-traffic injuries: confronting disparities to address a global-health problem , 2006, The Lancet.

[15]  Herbert Miehsler,et al.  EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT , 1983 .

[16]  M. Cropper,et al.  Traffic Fatalities and Economic Growth , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  A. Zwi,et al.  Road traffic injuries in developing countries: a comprehensive review of epidemiological studies , 1997, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[18]  C N Mock,et al.  Low utilization of formal medical services by injured persons in a developing nation: health service data underestimate the importance of trauma. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  Dac Maunder,et al.  THE CAUSES OF BUS ACCIDENTS IN FIVE EMERGING NATIONS , 2000 .

[20]  A. Aeron-Thomas,et al.  ESTIMATING GLOBAL ROAD FATALITIES , 2000 .

[21]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[22]  Yongli Xi,et al.  Economic development's effect on road transport-related mortality among different types of road users: a cross-sectional international study. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.