The Convolutional Group Sequential Test: Reducing Test Time for Evoked Potentials

When using a statistical test for automatically detecting evoked potentials, the number of stimuli presented to the subject (the sample size for the statistical test) should be specified at the outset. For evoked response detection, this may be inefficient, i.e., because the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the response is not known in advance, the user would usually err on the cautious side and use a relatively high number of stimuli to ensure adequate statistical power. A more efficient approach is to apply the statistical test repeatedly to the accumulating data over time, as this allows the test to be stopped early for the high SNR responses (thus reducing test time), or later for the low SNR responses. The caveat is that the critical decision boundaries for rejecting the null hypothesis need to be adjusted if the intended type-I error rate is to be obtained. This study presents an intuitive and flexible method for controlling the type-I error rate for sequentially applied statistical tests. The method is built around the discrete convolution of truncated probability density functions, which allows the null distribution for the test statistic to be constructed at each stage of the sequential analysis. Because the null distribution remains tractable, the procedure for finding the stage-wise critical decision boundaries is greatly simplified. The method also permits data-driven adaptations (using data from previous stages) to both the sample size and the statistical test, which offers new opportunities to speed up testing for evoked response detection.

[1]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The detection of adult cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using an automated statistic and visual detection , 2009, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Mario Cebulla,et al.  Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing Evaluación repetida en la detección de respuestas auditivas , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  Mario Cebulla,et al.  Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Gernot Wassmer,et al.  Basic concepts of group sequential and adaptive group sequential test procedures , 2000 .

[6]  Mark Chang,et al.  Adaptive design method based on sum of p‐values , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  M A Proschan,et al.  Designed extension of studies based on conditional power. , 1995, Biometrics.

[8]  W. Brannath,et al.  Recursive Combination Tests , 2002 .

[9]  S. Butler,et al.  The clinical role of evoked potentials , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  Jing Lv,et al.  Objective detection of evoked potentials using a bootstrap technique. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Guido Knapp,et al.  A New Class of Completely Self-Designing Clinical Trials† , 2003 .

[12]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[13]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[14]  C Elberling,et al.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  Mark Chang,et al.  Adaptive Design Methods in Clinical Trials , 2006 .

[16]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  p-Value calculation for multi-stage additive tests , 2007 .

[17]  W James,et al.  New Handbook Of Auditory Evoked Responses >>>CLICK HERE<<< , 2007 .

[18]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Asymptotic Optimality of Fisher's Method of Combining Independent Tests , 1971 .

[19]  D. Simpson,et al.  Objective measures for detecting the auditory brainstem response: comparisons of specificity, sensitivity and detection time , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[20]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[21]  H. Schäfer,et al.  Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches , 2001, Biometrics.

[22]  Howard C. Blue,et al.  Chapter 7. , 2007 .

[23]  P. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. , 1994, Biometrics.

[24]  J. D. Weerd,et al.  Evoked Potential Manual , 1990, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[26]  C. J. Tierra-Criollo,et al.  Objective Response Detection in an Electroencephalogram During Somatosensory Stimulation , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  G. Chi,et al.  On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive Designs , 2001, Biometrics.

[28]  E. Colon Evoked Potential Manual: A Practical Guide to Clinical Applications , 1990 .