An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study of the Accuracy of CyberKnife Spinal Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery requires the highest degree of accuracy in target identification and localization. When targeting paraspinal lesions, the CyberKnife radiosurgical system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) uses implanted stainless steel fiducials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the total system for clinically relevant accuracy of this approach. METHODS: The clinically relevant accuracy of the CyberKnife depends on 1) the accuracy of beam delivery, which in turn represents a compilation of robot and camera image-tracking errors, and 2) the inherent accuracy of target localization that stems from computed tomographic imaging and treatment planning. The clinically relevant accuracy was measured at three different CyberKnife facilities using head and torso phantoms loaded with packs of radiochromic film and expressed as a displacement of the dose contours from the treatment planning. RESULTS: The mean clinically relevant error, as measured at three different CyberKnife facilities, was determined to be 0.7 ± 0.3 mm, which did not vary with computed tomographic slice thickness in a range of 0.625 to 1.5 mm. The average treatment delivery precision was 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. Fiducial tracking error was less than 0.3 mm for radial translations up to 14 mm and less than 0.7 mm for rotations up to 4.5 degrees. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of relatively stationary spinal lesions targeted with fiducial tracking, the CyberKnife system is capable of submillimeter accuracy.

[1]  K. Winston,et al.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Physics of gamma knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  G H Hartmann,et al.  Stereotactic target point verification of an X ray and CT localizer. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A. Wu,et al.  Physics and dosimetry of the gamma knife. , 1992, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[5]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[6]  J Palta,et al.  Systematic analysis of errors in target localization and treatment delivery in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery , 1994, Modelling and Planning for Sensor Based Intelligent Robot Systems.

[8]  M J Murphy,et al.  The accuracy of dose localization for an image-guided frameless radiosurgery system. , 1996, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Galvin,et al.  Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 55. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  S Mutic,et al.  Stereotactic imaging quality assurance using an anthropomorphic phantom. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[11]  J. Nuyttens,et al.  Clinical implementation of the AAPM Task Group 36 recommendations on fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: A head and neck irradiation case report , 2000, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  Quality Assurance of Beam Accuracy for Leksell Gamma Unit , 2000, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  Steven D Chang,et al.  Image-guided Hypo-fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Spinal Lesions , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[14]  C. Yu,et al.  A Phantom Study of the Geometric Accuracy of Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereotactic Localization with the Leksell Stereotactic System , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[15]  William Main,et al.  An Analysis of the Accuracy of the CyberKnife: A Robotic Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgical System , 2003, Neurosurgery.