Development of a protocol to optimize electric power consumption and life cycle environmental impacts for operation of wastewater treatment plant

In wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), the portion of operating costs related to electric power consumption is increasing. If the electric power consumption decreased, however, it would be difficult to comply with the effluent water quality requirements. A protocol was proposed to minimize the environmental impacts as well as to optimize the electric power consumption under the conditions needed to meet the effluent water quality standards in this study. This protocol was comprised of six phases of procedure and was tested using operating data from S-WWTP to prove its applicability. The 11 major operating variables were categorized into three groups using principal component analysis and K-mean cluster analysis. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted for each group to deduce the optimal operating conditions for each operating state. Then, employing mathematical modeling, six improvement plans to reduce electric power consumption were deduced. The electric power consumptions for suggested plans were estimated using an artificial neural network. This was followed by a second round of LCA conducted on the plans. As a result, a set of optimized improvement plans were derived for each group that were able to optimize the electric power consumption and life cycle environmental impact, at the same time. Based on these test results, the WWTP operating management protocol presented in this study is deemed able to suggest optimal operating conditions under which power consumption can be optimized with minimal life cycle environmental impact, while allowing the plant to meet water quality requirements.

[1]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)--a case study. , 2004, Water research.

[2]  Ll Corominas,et al.  Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art. , 2013, Water research.

[3]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment as an environmental evaluation tool for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 2015 .

[4]  Wenhua Piao,et al.  Evaluation of rule-based control strategies according to process state diagnosis in A2/O process , 2013 .

[5]  Manuel Alcázar-Ortega,et al.  New artificial neural network prediction method for electrical consumption forecasting based on buil , 2011 .

[6]  C. Rosen,et al.  Adaptive multiscale principal components analysis for online monitoring of wastewater treatment. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Seong-Hoon Yoon Membrane Bioreactor Processes: Principles and Applications , 2015 .

[8]  Seniz Ertugrul,et al.  Prediction of manually controlled vessels' position and course navigating in narrow waterways using Artificial Neural Networks , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  S. Shrestha,et al.  Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[12]  Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.  Applications of artificial neural-networks for energy systems , 2000 .

[13]  Hyosoo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment and economic efficiency analysis of integrated management of wastewater treatment plants , 2016 .

[14]  M. T. Moreira,et al.  A comparison of municipal wastewater treatment plants for big centres of population in Galicia (Spain) , 2007 .

[15]  Jongrack Kim,et al.  A Study on Performance Estimation and Operation Strategy of Biological Aerated Filter Using Semi-Empirical Biofilm Model , 2014 .

[16]  Silvia Fiore,et al.  Evaluation of the energy efficiency of a large wastewater treatment plant in Italy , 2016 .

[17]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants , 2000 .

[18]  C W Kim,et al.  Identification of process operating state with operational map in municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[20]  Monique Polit,et al.  Prediction of parameters characterizing the state of a pollution removal biologic process , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  Daniel Aguado,et al.  Multivariate statistical monitoring of continuous wastewater treatment plants , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[22]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  ICA and me--a subjective review. , 2012, Water research.

[23]  Joaquín López-Castellanos,et al.  Principal factor and hierarchical cluster analyses for the performance assessment of an urban wastewater treatment plant in the Southeast of Spain. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[24]  Alberto Hernandez Neto,et al.  Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption , 2008 .

[25]  R. Bhamidimarri,et al.  Use of fuzzy neural-net model for rule generation of activated sludge process , 1999 .

[26]  H. Juahir,et al.  Chemometric approach to validating faecal sterols as source tracer for faecal contamination in water. , 2009, Water research.