Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl

This paper reports on a postphenomenological inquiry of six trained philosophers, who as study participants lived with and reflected on a research product we designed known as the Tilting Bowl: a ceramic bowl that unpredictably but gently tilts multiple times daily. The Tilting Bowl is a counterfactual artifact that is designed specifically for this study as part of a material speculation approach to design research. A postphenomenological inquiry looks to describe and analyze accounts of relationships between humans and technological artifacts, and how each mutually shapes the other through mediations that form the human subjectivity and objectivity of any given situation. This paper contributes an empirical account and analysis of the relations that emerged (background and alterity) and the relativistic views that co-constitute the philosophers, Tilting Bowl, and their specific worlds. The findings demonstrate the relevance of this philosophical framing to fundamentally and broadly understand how people engage digital artifacts.

[1]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Postphenomenology: A Critical Companion to Ihde , 2006 .

[2]  L. Winner.  DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[3]  Terry Winograd,et al.  On "Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design". A Response to the Reviews , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[4]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[5]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Peter P.C.C. Verbeek,et al.  Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations , 2008 .

[7]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor, by Richard Coyne , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[9]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Electric materialities and interactive technology , 2013, CHI.

[10]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Somaesthetic Appreciation Design , 2016, CHI.

[11]  Helena De Preester.  Postphenomenology and technoscience: the Peking University Lectures , 2010 .

[12]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Morse Things: A Design Inquiry into the Gap Between Things and Us , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[13]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[14]  Eric Paulos,et al.  A phenomenology of human-electricity relations , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Intersecting with Unaware Objects , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[16]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[17]  Phillipp Kaestner,et al.  Understanding Computers And Cognition A New Foundation For Design , 2016 .

[18]  James Pierce,et al.  Material awareness: promoting reflection on everyday materiality , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Richard Banks,et al.  From Research Prototype to Research Product , 2016, CHI.

[20]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[21]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device , 2015, CHI.

[22]  Albert Borgmann,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. , 1986 .

[23]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things , 2011 .

[24]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[25]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[26]  Bettina Nissen,et al.  On Speculative Enactments , 2017, CHI.

[27]  Peter Ljungstrand,et al.  The ChatterBox: Using Text Manipulation in an Entertaining Information Display , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[28]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[29]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  A field guide to postphenomenology , 2015 .

[30]  Don Ihde,et al.  Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction , 1998 .

[31]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Photobox: on the design of a slow technology , 2012, DIS '12.

[32]  Oscar Tomico,et al.  Embodied Design Ideation Methods: Analysing the Power of Estrangement , 2017, CHI.

[33]  Henry Lin,et al.  Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[34]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[35]  Markéta Dolejsová,et al.  StreetSauce , 2017, Interactions.

[36]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Videos of Things: Speculating on, Anticipating and Synthesizing Technological Mediations , 2017, CHI.

[37]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  Experience prototyping , 2000, DIS '00.

[38]  A. Feenberg.  The critical theory of technology , 1990 .

[39]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[40]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design , 2009, CHI.

[41]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction , 2011, CHI.

[42]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[43]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[44]  Carl Magnus Olsson,et al.  Beyond a utility view of personal informatics: a postphenomenological framework , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[45]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[46]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Architectures of interaction: an architectural perspective on digital experience , 2010, NordiCHI.

[47]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Productive Frictions: Moving from Digital to Material Prototyping and Low-Volume Production for Design Research , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.