Implementation of discrete element analysis for subject-specific, population-wide investigations of habitual contact stress exposure.

There exist no large-series human data linking contact stress exposure to an articular joint's propensity for developing osteoarthritis because contact stress analysis for large numbers of subjects remains impractical. The speed and simplicity of discrete element analysis (DEA) for estimating contact stresses makes its application to this problem highly attractive, but to date DEA has been used to study only a small numbers of cases. This is because substantial issues regarding its use in population-wide studies have not been addressed. Chief among them are developing fast and robust methods for model derivation and the selection of boundary conditions, establishing accuracy of computed contact stresses, and including capabilities for modeling in-series structural elements (e.g., a meniscus). This article describes an implementation of DEA that makes it feasible to perform subject-specific modeling in articular joints in large population-based studies.

[1]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  New methods for assessing cartilage contact stress after articular fracture. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  E Y Chao,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of limited intercarpal fusion for the treatment of Kienböck's disease: A three‐dimensional theoretical study , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Jeffrey T. Bingham,et al.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[5]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G. Lester,et al.  Clinical research in OA--the NIH Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2008, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[8]  Satoshi Hamai,et al.  Can magnetic resonance imaging–derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single‐plane three‐dimensional shape registration? , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Scott Tashman,et al.  A method to estimate in vivo dynamic articular surface interaction. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  MRI-based modeling for evaluation of in vivo contact mechanics in the human wrist during active light grasp. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. Brown,et al.  Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  David R Wilson,et al.  Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  E. Chao,et al.  Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing--effect of gender and anatomic parameters. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A Guermazi,et al.  Effect of meniscal damage on the development of frequent knee pain, aching, or stiffness. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation of human ankle joints under full body weight , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Hui Jin,et al.  Determination of Poisson's ratio of articular cartilage by indentation using different-sized indenters. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  J. Elias,et al.  Computational Modeling: An Alternative Approach for Investigating Patellofemoral Mechanics , 2007, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[18]  B B Seedhom,et al.  The relationship of the compressive modulus of articular cartilage with its deformation response to cyclic loading: does cartilage optimize its modulus so as to minimize the strains arising in it due to the prevalent loading regime? , 2001, Rheumatology.

[19]  K Y Volokh,et al.  On foundations of discrete element analysis of contact in diarthrodial joints. , 2007, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[20]  X. Zhang,et al.  Simultaneous segmentation of the bone and cartilage surfaces of a knee joint in 3D , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[21]  T. Brown,et al.  Patient‐specific finite element analysis of chronic contact stress exposure after intraarticular fracture of the tibial plafond , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  M. Hull,et al.  A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Epidemiologic studies for osteoarthritis: new versus conventional study design approaches. , 2004, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[24]  K. An,et al.  Pressure distribution on articular surfaces: application to joint stability evaluation. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Physical validation of a patient-specific contact finite element model of the ankle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Charles G. Peterfy,et al.  Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol , 2005, European Radiology.

[27]  Benjamin J Fregly,et al.  Multibody dynamic simulation of knee contact mechanics. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  B. Fregly,et al.  Sensitivity of knee replacement contact calculations to kinematic measurement errors , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.