Épistémologie des concepts de jugements de pertinence et de jugements de crédibilité WEB

Cet article propose une analyse conjointe des concepts de « jugements de pertinence » et de « jugements de credibilite Web ». Suivant une perspective epistemologique historique et critique, et a partir d’une exploration des theorisations anglo-saxonnes, l’article examine les formes, les fondements theoriques et les evolutions des deux concepts ainsi que les raisons de leur coexistence. Il examine premierement l’effort de formulation et de theorisation des jugements de pertinence au sein des sciences de l’information, ainsi que l’actualite de ce cadre conceptuel en regard de son usage par les industries de l’acces et du contenu. Puis sont considerees la pluralite des cadres conceptuels des jugements de credibilite developpee dans le domaine des interactions humains-machines (IHM), des sciences de communication et des sciences de l’information. Il se conclut sur deux problemes, theorique et methodologique, peu pris en consideration, quelles que soient les conceptualisations et les disciplines.

[1]  William Allen,et al.  The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness , 1953 .

[2]  Allen Kent,et al.  Machine literature searching VIII. Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems , 1955 .

[3]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Situational relevance , 1973, Inf. Storage Retr..

[4]  P. Wilson.  Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[5]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  Psychological Relevance and Information Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Thomas J. Froehlich,et al.  Relevance Reconsidered - Towards an Agenda for the 21st Century: Introduction to Special Topic Issue on Relevance Research , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Credibility and computing technology , 1999, CACM.

[9]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[10]  Howard Greisdorf.  Relevance: An Interdisciplinary and Information Science Perspective , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[11]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  D. R. Danielson,et al.  How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants , 2003, DUX '03.

[15]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2003 .

[16]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Marie-Pierre Fourquet-Courbet,et al.  Psychologie sociale, traitements et effets des médias , 2004 .

[18]  A. Brenner.  Quelle épistémologie historique ? Kuhn, Feyerabend, Hacking et l'école bachelardienne , 2006 .

[19]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Relevance : A Review of the Literature and a Framework for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science . Part III : Behavior and Effects of Relevance , 1976 .

[20]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information , 2007, Inf. Res..

[23]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , 2007 .

[24]  Elizabeth Van Couvering,et al.  Is Relevance Relevant? Market, Science, and War: Discourses of Search Engine Quality , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The sociological turn in information science , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Julian Warner.  Human Information Retrieval , 2009 .

[28]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  J. Gayon,et al.  French Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Research in France , 2009 .

[30]  Audrey Laplante.  Users' Relevance Criteria in Music Retrieval in Everyday Life: An Exploratory Study , 2010, ISMIR.

[31]  A. Schutz.  Collected Papers V. Phenomenology and the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[32]  P. Wagner-Egger.  Les canons de la rationalité : essai de classification des points de vue dans le débat sur les biais cognitifs et la rationalité humaine , 2011, L’Année psychologique.

[33]  P. Wagner-Egger.  Les canons de la rationalité: essai de classification des points de vue dans le débat sur les biais cognitifs et la rationalité humaine , 2011 .

[34]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  What kind of science can information science be? , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Fidelia Ibekwe-Sanjuan,et al.  The French conception of information science: "Une exception française"? , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  David Stuart,et al.  Google and the Culture of Search , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[37]  Jannica Heinström,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior , 2013, J. Documentation.

[38]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[39]  J. Dijck.  The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[40]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Uncovering epistemological assumptions underlying research in information studies , 2013, ASIST.

[42]  É. Maigret.  Ce que les cultural studies font aux savoirs disciplinaires , 2013 .

[43]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Information Science and Its Core Concepts: Levels of Disagreement , 2014 .

[44]  Yan Huang,et al.  Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME) , 2015 .

[45]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Classical databases and knowledge organization: A case for boolean retrieval and human decision‐making during searches , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  S. Sundar.  The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology , 2015 .

[47]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Psychological Approaches to Credibility Assessment Online , 2015 .

[48]  Wonchan Choi,et al.  Web credibility assessment: Conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Olof Sundin,et al.  Outsourcing trust to the information infrastructure in schools: How search engines order knowledge in education practices , 2016, J. Documentation.

[50]  Elaheh Hosseini,et al.  Theories of Information, Communication and Knowledge: A Multidisciplinary Approach , 2016, Webology.

[51]  Paul Hallé,et al.  À quoi rêvent les algorithmes , 2016 .

[52]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  The Notion of Relevance in Information Science: Everybody knows what relevance is. But, what is it really? , 2016, The Notion of Relevance in Information Science.

[53]  N. Petit,et al.  I. Les moteurs de recherche , 2017 .

[54]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  Online Social Influence and the Convergence of Mass and Interpersonal Communication , 2017 .

[55]  Melanie Feinberg.  Reading databases: slow information interactions beyond the retrieval paradigm , 2017, J. Documentation.

[56]  Niels Kerssens,et al.  When search engines stopped being human: menu interfaces and the rise of the ideological nature of algorithmic search , 2017 .

[57]  pillonl.  Epistémologie des sciences sociales , 2017 .

[58]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for video in leisure contexts , 2018, J. Documentation.