Processing natural language arguments with theplatform

In this article, we first present the platform and the Dislog language, designed for discourse analysis with a logic and linguistic perspective. The platform has now reached a certain level of maturity which allows the recognition of a large diversity of discourse structures including general-purpose rhetorical structures as well as domain-specific discourse structures. The Dislog language is based on linguistic considerations and includes knowledge access and inference capabilities. Functionalities of the language are presented together with a method for writing discourse analysis rules. Efficiency and portability of the system over domains and languages are investigated to conclude this first part. In a second part, we analyse the different types of arguments found in several document genres, most notably: procedures, didactic texts and requirements. Arguments form a large class of discourse relations. A generic and frequently encountered form emerges from our analysis: ‘reasons for conclusion’...

[1]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively , 1986 .

[2]  Chris Reed,et al.  Content Ordering in the Generation of Persuasive Discourse , 1997, IJCAI.

[3]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Customizing RST for the Automatic Production of Technical Manuals , 1992, NLG.

[4]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Natural Language Processing in Pop-11: An Introduction to Computational Linguistics , 1989 .

[5]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[6]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  Investigating the Structure of Procedural Texts for Answering How-to Questions , 2008, LREC.

[7]  Deniz Zeyrek,et al.  Annotating Discourse Connectives in Spoken Turkish , 2014, LAW@COLING.

[8]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The place of emotion in argument , 1992 .

[9]  Giacomo Ferrari Preliminary steps towards the creation of a discourse and text resource , 1998 .

[10]  D. Davidson Essays on actions and events , 1980 .

[11]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .

[12]  Keith Neil Vander Linden Speaking of actions: choosing rhetorical status and grammatical form in instructional text generation , 1993 .

[13]  J. Adam Types de séquences textuelles élémentaires , 1987 .

[14]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Knowledge and justification , 1983 .

[15]  Satoshi Sekine,et al.  Using Phrasal Patterns to Identify Discourse Relations , 2006, HLT-NAACL.

[16]  Henri Prade,et al.  An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision , 2005, ECSQARU.

[17]  Cécile Paris,et al.  Expressing Procedural Relationships in Multilingual Instructions , 1994, INLG.

[18]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .

[19]  Gerardo Sierra,et al.  Definitional verbal patterns for semantic relation extraction , 2008 .

[20]  G. Meade Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory , 2001 .

[21]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  Towards Building Annotated Resources for Analyzing Opinions and Argumentation in News Editorials , 2010, LREC.

[22]  Holger Schauer,et al.  From Elementary Discourse Units to Complex Ones , 2000, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[23]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  SARA: A Text-Based and Reader-Based Theory of Signaling , 2008 .

[24]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[25]  Patrick Saint-Dizier Advanced logic programming for language processing , 1994 .

[26]  Martin Caminada,et al.  On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[27]  Floriana Grasso,et al.  Recent advances in computational models of natural argument , 2007, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[28]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  Analyzing the Explanation Structure of Procedural Texts: Dealing with Advice and Warnings , 2008, STEP.

[29]  W. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: looking back and moving ahead , 2006 .

[30]  S. Thompson,et al.  Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .

[31]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective , 1992 .

[32]  David H. D. Warren,et al.  Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis - A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[33]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[34]  Hermann Helbig Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language (Cognitive Technologies) , 2005 .

[35]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation , 2000, ECAI.

[36]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[37]  Hermann Helbig,et al.  Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language , 2005, Cognitive Technologies.

[38]  George R. Bieger,et al.  The Information Content of Picture-Text Instructions , 1985 .

[39]  Patrice Lopez Repair Strategies for Lexicalized Tree Grammars , 1999, EACL.

[40]  Guy Lapalme,et al.  Choosing Rhetorical Structures To Plan Instructional Texts , 2000, Comput. Intell..

[41]  Types de séquences élémentaires , 1987 .

[42]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Explanation and Cognition , 2000 .

[43]  Chris Reed,et al.  Generating the Structure of Argument , 1998, ACL.

[44]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Knowledge Representation , 1998 .

[45]  Daniel Marcu The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts , 1997 .

[46]  Noam Chomsky Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[47]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  Free Adjuncts in Natural Language Instructions , 1990, COLING.

[48]  F. Keil,et al.  Explanation and understanding , 2015 .

[49]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  The language of explanation dedicated to technical documents , 2011 .

[50]  A. Wierzbicka English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary , 1987 .

[51]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[52]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Feature Selection in Categorizing Procedural Expressions , 2003 .

[53]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[55]  G. Redeker Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure , 1990 .

[56]  Bonnie Webber,et al.  Pragmatic overloading in Natural Language instructions , 1996 .

[57]  Robert L. Martin,et al.  Knowledge and Justification. , 1976 .

[58]  Paul Sabatier,et al.  A Linguistic Approach to Some Parameters of Layout: A Study of Enumerations , 1999 .

[59]  Jacques Moeschler Chapter 12. Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation , 2001 .

[60]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in argumentative discussions , 1984 .

[61]  Manfred Stede,et al.  Discourse Processing , 2011, NAACL.

[62]  J. Moeschler The role of explicature in communication and in intercultural communication , 2007 .

[63]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Advances in Pragma Dialectics , 2002 .

[64]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  Extraposition Grammars , 1981, CL.

[65]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations , 2002, ACL.

[66]  Alain Colmerauer,et al.  Metamorphosis Grammars , 1978, Natural Language Communication with Computers.

[67]  Rashmi Prasad,et al.  Annotating Discourse Connectives and Their Arguments , 2004, FCP@NAACL-HLT.

[68]  Helmut Horacek,et al.  Argumentation in Explanations to Logical Problems , 2001, International Conference on Computational Science.