Ruggedness Quantifying for Constrained Continuous Fitness Landscapes

Constrained optimization problems appear frequently in important real-world applications. In this chapter, we study algorithms for constrained optimiation problems from a theoretical perspective. Our goal is to understand how the fitness landscape influences the success of certain types of algorithms. One important feature for analyzing and classifying fitness landscape is its ruggedness. It is generally assumed that rugged landscapes make the optimization process by bio-inspired computing methods much harder than smoothed landscapes, which give clear hints toward an optimal solution. We introduce different methods for quantifying the ruggedness of a given constrained optimization problem. They, in particular, take into account how to deal with infeasible regions in the underlying search space.

[1]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  A Collection of Test Problems for Constrained Global Optimization Algorithms , 1990, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Bart Naudts,et al.  A comparison of predictive measures of problem difficulty in evolutionary algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[4]  Wim Hordijk,et al.  A Measure of Landscapes , 1996, Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Mitsuo Gen,et al.  Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization , 1999 .

[6]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[7]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution and Optimum Seeking: The Sixth Generation , 1993 .

[8]  Vesselin K. Vassilev,et al.  Smoothness, ruggedness and neutrality of fitness landscapes: from theory to application , 2003 .

[9]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[10]  E. Weinberger,et al.  Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[12]  Xin Yao,et al.  Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  Christian Bierwirth,et al.  A search space analysis of the Job Shop Scheduling Problem , 1999, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  Bernd Bischl,et al.  Exploratory landscape analysis , 2011, GECCO '11.

[15]  Andries Petrus Engelbrecht,et al.  Quantifying ruggedness of continuous landscapes using entropy , 2009, 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Bernard Manderick,et al.  The Genetic Algorithm and the Structure of the Fitness Landscape , 1991, ICGA.

[17]  M. Lipsitch Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes Generated by Local Interactions of Neighboring Genes , 2022 .

[18]  P. Suganthan,et al.  Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2010 Competition on Constrained Real- Parameter Optimization , 2010 .

[19]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Towards a theory of landscapes , 1995 .

[20]  Shigeyoshi Tsutsui,et al.  Advances in evolutionary computing: theory and applications , 2003 .

[21]  Jing J. Liang,et al.  Problem Deflnitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2006 Special Session on Constrained Real-Parameter Optimization , 2006 .

[22]  Lashon B. Booker,et al.  Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Genetic algorithms , 1991 .

[23]  N. Hansen,et al.  Markov Chain Analysis of Cumulative Step-Size Adaptation on a Linear Constrained Problem , 2015, Evolutionary Computation.

[24]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: Past, present and future , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[25]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Information Characteristics and the Structure of Landscapes , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Fitness Landscapes and Evolvability , 2002, Evolutionary Computation.

[27]  G. Box Box and Jenkins: Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control , 2013 .