Establishing an outpatient clinic for minimally invasive vein care.

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive vein care procedures are less invasive than surgery and have a lower complication rate, are well tolerated by patients, and have good cosmetic results. Because radiologists have expertise in imaging-guided procedures, offering minimally invasive vein care is a logical step. CONCLUSION Starting an effective outpatient vein care clinic involves decisions about space, equipment, and advertising. With proper staffing and rapport with patients and referring physicians, a varicose vein practice can be a profitable adjunct to any radiology practice.

[1]  James G. Chandler,et al.  Endovenous management of saphenous vein reflux , 2000 .

[2]  J. Perälä,et al.  Endovenous obliteration with radiofrequency-resistive heating for greater saphenous vein insufficiency: a feasibility study. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  R. Depalma,et al.  Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  F. Lurie,et al.  Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  J. Bergan.  Vein diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive approach , 2001 .

[6]  T. Proebstle,et al.  Endovenous laser treatment of the lesser saphenous vein with a 940-nm diode laser: early results. , 2003 .

[7]  Robert A Weiss,et al.  Comparison of Endovenous Radiofrequency Versus 810 nm Diode Laser Occlusion of Large Veins in an Animal Model , 2002, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[8]  C. Wittens,et al.  Initial experiences in endovenous treatment of saphenous vein reflux. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  Jukka Perälä,et al.  Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  R. Min,et al.  Endovenous Laser: A New Minimally Invasive Method of Treatment for Varicose Veins—Preliminary Observations Using an 810 nm Diode Laser , 2001, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[11]  R. Min,et al.  Duplex ultrasound evaluation of lower extremity venous insufficiency. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[12]  R. Weiss,et al.  Controlled Radiofrequency Endovenous Occlusion Using a Unique Radiofrequency Catheter Under Duplex Guidance to Eliminate Saphenous Varicose Vein Reflux: A 2‐Year Follow‐Up , 2002, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[13]  R. Dilley,et al.  Real-time color duplex scanning after sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  R. Min,et al.  Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  M. Goldman.  Closure of the Greater Saphenous Vein with Endoluminal Radiofrequency Thermal Heating of the Vein Wall in Combination with Ambulatory Phlebectomy: Preliminary 6‐Month Follow‐up , 2000, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[16]  C. Feied,et al.  Vein Diagnosis & Treatment: A Comprehensive Approach , 2000 .

[17]  THOMAS M. PROEBSTLE,et al.  Nonocclusion and Early Reopening of the Great Saphenous Vein After Endovenous Laser Treatment Is Fluence Dependent , 2004, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].