Kirigami design and fabrication for biomimetic robotics

Biomimetics faces a continual challenge of how to bridge the gap between what Nature has so effectively evolved and the current tools and materials that engineers and scientists can exploit. Kirigami, from the Japanese ‘cut’ and ‘paper’, is a method of design where laminar materials are cut and then forced out-of-plane to yield 3D structures. Kirimimetic design provides a convenient and relatively closed design space within which to replicate some of the most interesting niche biological mechanisms. These include complex flexing organelles such as cilia in algae, energy storage and buckled structures in plants, and organic appendages that actuate out-of-plane such as the myoneme of the Vorticella protozoa. Where traditional kirigami employs passive materials which must be forced to transition to higher dimensions, we can exploit planar smart actuators and artificial muscles to create self-actuating kirigami structures. Here we review biomimetics with respect to the kirigami design and fabrication methods and examine how smart materials, including electroactive polymers and shape memory polymers, can be used to realise effective biomimetic components for robotic, deployable structures and engineering systems. One-way actuation, for example using shape memory polymers, can yield complete self-deploying structures. Bi-directional actuation, in contrast, can be exploited to mimic fundamental biological mechanisms such as thrust generation and fluid control. We present recent examples of kirigami robotic mechanisms and actuators and discuss planar fabrication methods, including rapid prototyping and 3D printing, and how current technologies, and their limitations, affect Kirigami robotics.

[1]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Elastomeric Origami: Programmable Paper‐Elastomer Composites as Pneumatic Actuators , 2012 .

[2]  E. Smela,et al.  Controlled Folding of Micrometer-Size Structures , 1995, Science.

[3]  J. Sambles,et al.  Photonic structures in biology , 2003, Nature.

[4]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Printing 3D dielectric elastomer actuators for soft robotics , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[5]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Thermal response of novel shape memory polymer-shape memory alloy hybrids , 2014, Smart Structures.

[6]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Electrostatic and thermal segmentation of multi-segment IPMC sensor-actuators , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[7]  S. Douady,et al.  The filling law: a general framework for leaf folding and its consequences on leaf shape diversity. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Rashi Tiwari,et al.  The state of understanding of ionic polymer metal composite architecture: a review , 2011 .

[9]  K. Kuribayashi,et al.  Self-deployable origami stent grafts as a biomedical application of Ni-rich TiNi shape memory alloy foil , 2006 .

[10]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Swimming like algae: biomimetic soft artificial cilia , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Sahar Jazebi ORIGAMI, KIRIGAMI, AND THE MODELING OF LEAVES: AN INTERACTIVE COMPUTER APPLICATION , 2012 .

[12]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges, Second Edition , 2004 .

[13]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Design of a deployable structure with shape memory polymers , 2012, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[14]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  The geometry of unfolding tree leaves , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Three-phase Control for Miniaturization of a Snake-like Swimming Robot , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[16]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Fabrication and analysis of dielectric-elastomer minimum-energy structures for highly-deformable soft robotic systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Optimisation in a natural system: Argentine ants solve the Towers of Hanoi , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Harnessing electromechanical membrane wrinkling for actuation , 2012 .

[19]  Q. Pei,et al.  High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100% , 2000, Science.

[20]  Hao Yan,et al.  Folding and cutting DNA into reconfigurable topological nanostructures. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[21]  Markus Löchtefeld,et al.  Morphees: toward high "shape resolution" in self-actuated flexible mobile devices , 2013, CHI.

[22]  Patrick T. Mather,et al.  Review of progress in shape-memory polymers , 2007 .

[23]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Stretchable circuits and sensors for robotic origami , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Xiaofeng Qian,et al.  Patterning of graphene. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[25]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Kirigami artificial muscles with complex biologically inspired morphologies , 2012 .

[26]  C. Muir How Did the Swiss Cheese Plant Get Its Holes? , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Tamar Flash,et al.  How to move with no rigid skeleton? The octopus has the answers. , 2002, Biologist.

[28]  J Dumais,et al.  The Fern Sporangium: A Unique Catapult , 2012, Science.

[29]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  A linear actuator from a single ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC) strip , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.