Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology

In order to expand upon the limited literature estimating the quantity and quality of worldwide research production in the field of microbiology, a bibliometric analysis was conducted for the period 1995–2003 using the PubMed and Journal Citation Reports databases. By searching the “microbiology” category of the Journal Citation Reports database, a total of 74 journals were identified that were also included in PubMed. From these journals, a total of 89,527 articles were identified for analysis, and data on the country in which the research originated was available for 88,456 (98.8%) of them. The individual countries were separated into nine world regions. In terms of research production for the period studied, Western Europe exceeded all other world regions, with the USA ranking second. The mean impact factor was highest for the USA at 3.4, while it was 2.8 for Western Europe and 2.4 for the rest of the world combined. The research productivity per unit of expenditure for research and development was higher for Canada and Western Europe than for the USA. The three regions in which research productivity increased the most were Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

[1]  J. Boldt,et al.  Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years , 2000, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  F. Gutiérrez,et al.  Publication of European Union Research on Infectious Diseases (1991–2001): A Bibliometric Evaluation , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[4]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[5]  B. New,et al.  The Case Against , 2018, Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research.

[6]  T. Luukkonen,et al.  Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. , 1990, Annals of medicine.

[7]  E. Gallagher,et al.  Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine's scientific contributions. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  G Winkmann,et al.  Medizinisch-biowissenschaftliche Datenbanken und der Impact-Faktor , 2000 .

[9]  G. Gensini,et al.  [The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production]. , 1999, Annali italiani di medicina interna : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di medicina interna.

[10]  E. Garfield,et al.  Citation indexes for science. , 1956, Science.

[11]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.

[12]  Impact factors of dermatological journals for 1991 – 2000 , 2001, BMC dermatology.