On the joint valuation of averting fatal and severe injuries in highway accidents.

INTRODUCTION To evaluate the benefits of road transport safety projects, planners need the monetary value of averting fatal and severe injuries. Usually, contingent valuation and risk-risk studies have been used. The contexts posed by both survey techniques do not represent the choice situation a driver faces when having to choose among alternative routes with different levels of safety. METHOD We set up a stated choice web page survey in which individuals had to choose between two routes for a hypothetical trip between two cities; thus implicitly revealing their preferences for safety both in terms of reducing the number of fatal victims and of severely injured victims. RESULTS For Chilean routes we were able to estimate approximate values of US$300,000 and US$140,000 for a reduction in one fatality and one severely injured victim, respectively. IMPACTS Our evidence could be valuable for road planners in other developing nations.

[1]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[2]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[3]  Graham Loomes,et al.  VALUING THE PREVENTION OF NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: CONTINGENT VALUATION VS. STANDARD GAMBLES , 1995 .

[4]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Risk Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Chile , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  A Definition of Subjective Probability , 1963 .

[6]  Alan Randall,et al.  Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit-Cost Test: Reply , 1989 .

[7]  K. Sælensminde.  Embedding effects in valuation of non-market goods , 2003 .

[8]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  Inconsistent choices in Stated Choice data;Use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases , 2001 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[10]  J De Dios Ortuzar.  MODELLING ROUTE AND MULTIMODAL CHOICES WITH REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE DATA , 1996 .

[11]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[13]  Joel Huber,et al.  Improving Parameter Estimates and Model Prediction by Aggregate Customization in Choice Experiments , 2001 .

[14]  D. Hensher,et al.  Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates , 2005 .

[15]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[16]  De Blaeij,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life in Road Safety; stated preference methodologies and empirical estimates for the Netherlands , 2003 .

[17]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 2 - The CV/SG "Chained" Approach , 1998 .

[18]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  ROAD SAFETY VALUATION UNDER A STATED CHOICE FRAMEWORK , 2006 .

[19]  Graham Loomes,et al.  THE VALUE OF PREVENTING NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: FINDINGS OF A WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY , 1993 .

[20]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[21]  Paula Iragüen,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for reducing fatal accident risk in urban areas: an Internet-based Web page stated preference survey. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Confidence intervals to bound the value of time , 2001 .

[23]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Variations between Countries in Values of Statistical Life , 2000 .

[24]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.