Validation of Severe Accident Codes on the Phebus Fission Product Tests in the Framework of the PHEBEN-2 Project

Abstract Analyses of severe accidents in nuclear power plants by using integral codes are necessary in order to develop accident management strategies that prevent such accidents or mitigate their consequences for the environment. The most important requirement for the development of integral codes is to achieve good predictability of a given accident scenario through the understanding and quantification of severe accident phenomena and their underlying physical and chemical processes. In this paper, the progress in modeling the processes related to the radioactive source term, and in particular progress related to the release and transport of fission products in the circuit and containment, is demonstrated by the assessment of integral and detailed codes using the experimental results of the in-pile Phebus fission product tests (FPTs). It is shown that the integral codes are good in predicting both the hydrogen release and the total release of volatile fission products from the bundle. It is also shown that the commonly used fission product transport codes overestimate the deposited aerosol mass in the Phebus steam generator. However, by using an improved model for the thermophoretic aerosol particle deposition, it has been possible to reproduce the aerosol mass deposited in the steam generator more accurately. The containment analyses carried out with both lumped-parameter and multidimensional computational fluid dynamics codes showed that the measured thermal-hydraulic data are accurately reproduced. The aerosol behavior in the containment estimated from the lumped-parameter codes corresponded satisfactorily to the experimental data. The iodine chemistry codes highlighted the substantial role of silver released from the degraded absorber rod (Ag-In-Cd), as it was observed experimentally; however, the temporal dependence of the gaseous iodine concentration in the containment atmosphere was poorly calculated. There are plans to improve the modeling in order to reproduce better the fission product release from the bundle, the fission product transport in the primary circuit duct, and the gas phase chemistry in the containment, with particular emphasis on gaseous iodine species. Further plans include the analysis of Phebus FPT3, which was the last in the series of Phebus tests, with its boron-carbide control rod.

[1]  K. E. Washington,et al.  Code manual for CONTAIN 2.0: A computer code for nuclear reactor containment analysis , 1997 .

[2]  Francisco J. Romay,et al.  Thermophoretic deposition of aerosol particles in turbulent pipe flow , 1998 .

[3]  P. von der Hardt,et al.  PHEBUS FP: a severe accident research programme for current and advanced light water reactors , 1999 .

[4]  H. E. Sims,et al.  Development of the INSPECT Model for the Prediction of Iodine Volatility from Irradiated Solutions , 2000 .

[5]  Johan Carlsson,et al.  Two-Dimensional Effects in Thermophoretic Particle Deposition: the PHEBUS-FP Steam Generator. , 2001 .

[6]  Elisabeth Krausmann,et al.  Reaction Kinetics of a Fission-Product Mixture in a Steam-Hydrogen Carrier Gas in the Phebus Primary Circuit , 2003 .

[7]  P. von der Hardt,et al.  LWR severe accident simulation: synthesis of the results and interpretation of the first Phebus FP experiment FPT0 , 2003 .

[8]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Validation of severe accident codes against Phebus FP for plant applications: Status of the PHEBEN2 project , 2003 .

[9]  A. Dehbi.  Tracking Aerosols in Large Volumes With the Help of CFD , 2004 .

[10]  Martin Steinbrück,et al.  Core Loss During a Severe Accident (COLOSS) , 2004 .

[11]  S. Güntay,et al.  Phébus-FP: Results and significance for plant safety in Switzerland , 2005 .

[12]  Marc Barrachin,et al.  Fission product release in the first two PHEBUS tests FPT0 and FPT1 , 2005 .

[13]  C. Housiadas,et al.  Thermophoretic Deposition in Tube Flow , 2005 .

[14]  M. P. Kissane,et al.  Interpretation of fission-product transport behaviour in the Phébus FPT0 and FPT1 tests , 2006 .

[15]  Luis E. Herranz,et al.  Iodine Behaviour under LWR Accident Conditions: Lessons Learnt from Analyses of the First Two Phebus FP Tests , 2006 .

[16]  L. Cantrel,et al.  Mass transfer modeling with and without evaporation for iodine chemistry in the case of a severe accident , 2006 .

[17]  F. Martín-Fuertes,et al.  Analysis of source term aspects in the experiment Phebus FPT1 with the MELCOR and CFX codes , 2007 .