Getting the Measure of Derivational Morphology in Adult Speech: A Corpus Analysis Using MorphoQuantics

This paper describes the methodology used to compile a corpus called MorphoQuantics that contains a comprehensive set of 17,943 complex word types extracted from the spoken component of the British National Corpus (BNC). The categorisation of these complex words was derived primarily from the classification of Prefixes, Suffixes and Combining Forms proposed by Stein (2007). The MorphoQuantics corpus has been made available on a website of the same name; it lists 554 word-initial and 281 word-final morphemes in English, their etymology and meaning, and records the type and token frequencies of all the associated complex words containing these morphemes from the spoken element of the BNC, together with their Part of Speech. The results show that, although the number of word-initial affixes is nearly double that of word-final affixes, the relative number of each observed in the BNC is very similar; however, word-final affixes are more productive in that, on average, the frequency with which they attach to different bases is three times that of word-initial affixes. Finally, this paper considers how linguists, psycholinguists and psychologists may use MorphoQuantics to support their empirical work in first and second language acquisition, and clinical and educational research.

[1]  Adrienne Lehrer,et al.  Scapes, Holics, and Thons: The Semantics of English Combining Forms , 1998 .

[2]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Morphological productivity across speech and writing , 1999, English Language and Linguistics.

[3]  J. M. Anglin Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology , 2013 .

[5]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The Lexicon in Acquisition , 1996 .

[6]  Begoña Montero-Fleta,et al.  Suffixes in word-formation processes in scientific English , 2011 .

[7]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  41. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity , 2009 .

[8]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Morphologically Complex Words in L1 and L2 Processing: Evidence from Masked Priming Experiments in English. , 2008 .

[9]  L. Moats,et al.  Derivational Morphology: Why It Should Be Included in Language Assessment and Instruction. , 1992 .

[10]  Nivja H. de Jong,et al.  The morphological family size effect and morphology , 2000 .

[11]  M. Taft Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[13]  M. Garman,et al.  Language acquisition : studies in first language development , 1982 .

[14]  B. Derwing,et al.  Language acquisition: Assessing morphological development , 1986 .

[15]  Mary J. Schleppegrell Linguistic Features of the Language of Schooling , 2001 .

[16]  Mary J. Schleppegrell The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective , 2004 .

[17]  David Corson,et al.  The lexical bar , 1985 .

[18]  J. Baron,et al.  Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology , 1982 .

[19]  Tvrtko Prćić Prefixes vs Initial Combining Forms in English: A Lexicographic Perspective1 , 2005 .

[20]  Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften,et al.  The Child's construction of language , 1981 .

[21]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Parsing and productivity , 2002 .

[22]  Gabriele Stein A dictionary of English affixes : their function and meaning , 2007 .

[23]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[24]  M Abecassis,et al.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. , 2010 .

[25]  Bjanka Pokorny,et al.  Exploring language structure—A student’s guide , 2009 .

[26]  H. Marchand The categories and types of present-day English word-formation : a synchronic-diachronic approach , 1960 .

[27]  Tvrtko Prćić,et al.  Suffixes vs Final Combining Forms in English: A Lexicographic Perspective , 2007 .

[28]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Lexical Innovations: How Children Learn to Create New Words. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, Number 18. , 1980 .

[29]  C. Marshall,et al.  Derivational morphology in children with Grammatical‐Specific Language Impairment , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[30]  R. Baayen,et al.  On frequency, transparency and productivity , 1993 .