User-defined challenges and desiderata for robotics and autonomous systems in health and social care settings

ABSTRACT We report the needs and challenges identified by health and social care professionals and service users for robotics and autonomous systems that are of importance to researchers and policymakers. To this end, we held eight workshops in different locations across Cornwall (UK) in which we raised awareness of the applications and opportunities of assistive robots. The 223 participants could interact physically with four robots, watched a multimedia presentation including video and use-case scenarios and then took part in 33 focus groups. Content analysis was carried out based on summaries written by facilitators during the focus groups. The focus groups produced 163 challenges that may have digital solutions including 78 suitable for robotic assistive technology, in three main areas: maintaining independence at home, social isolation, and rurality. Although further research is needed with technology and its implementation, this study shows that health and social care professionals, patients, carers, and students are willing to consider using robotics and autonomous systems in health and social care settings. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

[1]  T. Lourens,et al.  Improving Collaborative Play Between Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Their Siblings: The Effectiveness of a Robot-Mediated Intervention Based on Lego® Therapy , 2014, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[2]  Anthony B. Atkinson,et al.  Income and living conditions in Europe , 2010 .

[3]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  Saskia M. Kelders,et al.  An Exploration of the Benefits of an Animallike Robot Companion with More Advanced Touch Interaction Capabilities for Dementia Care , 2017, Front. ICT.

[5]  Sandra Bedaf,et al.  What Should a Robot do for you? - Evaluating the Needs of the Elderly in the UK , 2013, ACHI 2013.

[6]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[7]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[8]  B Stanberry,et al.  Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century , 2000, Journal of internal medicine.

[9]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[10]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  Robotics for healthcare: Final report , 2008 .

[11]  Praminda Caleb-Solly,et al.  Robotics in Social Care: A Connected Care EcoSystem for Independent Living , 2017 .

[12]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[13]  C. A. Lin,et al.  Drone delivery of medications: Review of the landscape and legal considerations. , 2018, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[14]  Katherine M. Tsui,et al.  Exploring use cases for telepresence robots , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Humanoid Robot Features on Patient Emotion during a Medicine Delivery Task , 2010 .

[16]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  W. Moyle,et al.  Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[18]  M. Matarić,et al.  Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics , 2007 .

[19]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  How to Implement Robots in Interventions for Children with Autism? A Co-creation Study Involving People with Autism, Parents and Professionals , 2017, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[20]  F. Jouen,et al.  “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[21]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  A Survey of Expectations About the Role of Robots in Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment , 2015, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[22]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Designing a Home of the Future , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[23]  Gregor Wolbring,et al.  Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[24]  Emilia I. Barakova,et al.  Mobile Application for Executing Therapies with Robots , 2017, IWANN.

[25]  Jeffrey Soar,et al.  Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[26]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child Speech Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: Evaluations and Recommendations , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[27]  D. Morgan Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[28]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  A new robot architecture for tele-echography , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[29]  François Michaud,et al.  Telepresence Robot for Home Care Assistance , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[30]  B. MacDonald,et al.  The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[31]  L. Wong,et al.  Focus group discussion: a tool for health and medical research. , 2008, Singapore medical journal.

[32]  Elaine Welsh,et al.  Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process , 2002 .

[33]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[34]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Humanoid Robot Assisted Training for Facial Expressions Recognition Based on Affective Feedback , 2015, ICSR.

[35]  Igor Zubrycki,et al.  Understanding Therapists’ Needs and Attitudes Towards Robotic Support. The Roboterapia Project , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[36]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Socially Assistive Humanoid Robot for Guiding Elderly Individuals during Walking , 2017, Future Internet.

[37]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[38]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[39]  T. Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly – A Mini-Review , 2010, Gerontology.