HIGAN: Cosmic Neutral Hydrogen with Generative Adversarial Networks

One of the most promising ways to observe the Universe is by detecting the 21cm emission from cosmic neutral hydrogen (HI) through radio-telescopes. Those observations can shed light on fundamental astrophysical questions only if accurate theoretical predictions are available. In order to maximize the scientific return of these surveys, those predictions need to include different observables and be precise on non-linear scales. Currently, one of the best ways to achieve this is via cosmological hydrodynamic simulations; however, the computational cost of these simulations is high -- tens of millions of CPU hours. In this work, we use Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGANs) to generate new high-resolution ($35~h^{-1}{\rm kpc}$) 3D realizations of cosmic HI at $z=5$. We do so by sampling from a 100-dimension manifold, learned by the generator, that characterizes the fully non-linear abundance and clustering of cosmic HI from the state-of-the-art simulation IllustrisTNG. We show that different statistical properties of the produced samples -- 1D PDF, power spectrum, bispectrum, and void size function -- match very well those of IllustrisTNG, and outperform state-of-the-art models such as Halo Occupation Distributions (HODs). Our WGAN samples reproduce the abundance of HI across 9 orders of magnitude, from the Ly$\alpha$ forest to Damped Lyman Absorbers. WGAN can produce new samples orders of magnitude faster than hydrodynamic simulations.

[1]  Jean-Louis Rouet,et al.  Cosmological structure formation with negative mass , 2018, Physical Review D.

[2]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Cosmological model discrimination with Deep Learning , 2017, 1707.05167.

[3]  Evan J. Arena,et al.  Inflation and Early Dark Energy with a Stage II Hydrogen Intensity Mapping experiment , 2018, 1810.09572.

[4]  Léon Bottou,et al.  Wasserstein GAN , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  Learning to predict the cosmological structure formation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  David Alonso,et al.  Cosmology with a SKA HI intensity mapping survey , 2015, 1501.03989.

[7]  Shiro Ikeda,et al.  Denoising Weak Lensing Mass Maps with Deep Learning , 2018, Physical Review D.

[8]  Yu Feng,et al.  Intensity mapping with neutral hydrogen and the Hidden Valley simulations , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[9]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs , 2017, NIPS.

[10]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Distinguishing standard and modified gravity cosmologies with machine learning , 2018, Physical Review D.

[11]  Yiming Yang,et al.  MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Network , 2017, NIPS.

[12]  Barnabás Póczos,et al.  Enabling Dark Energy Science with Deep Generative Models of Galaxy Images , 2016, AAAI.

[13]  Barnabás Póczos,et al.  Estimating Cosmological Parameters from the Dark Matter Distribution , 2016, ICML.

[14]  Tom Charnock,et al.  Painting halos from cosmic density fields of dark matter with physically motivated neural networks , 2019, Physical Review D.

[15]  Michelle Ntampaka,et al.  Machine Learning Applied to the Reionization History of the Universe in the 21 cm Signal , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[16]  B. Nord,et al.  DeepCMB: Lensing Reconstruction of the Cosmic Microwave Background with Deep Neural Networks , 2018, Astron. Comput..