A Critical Comparison of Some Metrological Parameters Characterizing Local Digital Image Correlation and Grid Method

The main metrological performance of two full-field measurement techniques, namely local digital image correlation (DIC) and grid method (GM), are compared in this paper. The fundamentals of these techniques are first briefly recalled. The formal link which exists between them is then given (the details of the calculation are in Appendix 1). Under mild assumptions, it is shown that GM theoretically gives the same result as DIC, since the formula providing the displacement with GM is the solution of the minimization of the cost function used in DIC in the particular case of a regular marking. In practice however, the way the solution is found being totally different from one technique to another, they feature different metrological performance. Some of the metrological characteristics of DIC and GM are studied in this paper. Since neither guideline nor precise standard is available to perform a fair comparison between them, a methodology must first be defined. It is proposed here to rely on three metrological parameters, namely the displacement resolution, the bias and the spatial resolution, to assess the metrological performance of each technique. These three parameters are thoroughly defined in the paper. Some of these quantities depend on external parameters such as the pattern of the surface of interest, so the same set of grid images is processed with both techniques. Only the contribution of the camera sensor noise to the displacement resolution is considered in this study. The displacement resolution, the bias and the spatial resolution are not independent but linked. These links are therefore studied in depth for DIC and GM and compared. In particular, it is shown that the product between the displacement resolution and the spatial resolution can be considered as a metric to perform this comparison. The extension to speckled patterns of the lessons drawn from grids is finally addressed in the last part of the paper. As a general conclusion, it can be said that for the value of the bias fixed in this study, the additional cost due to grid depositing offers GM to feature a better compromise than subset-based local DIC between displacement resolution and spatial resolution.

[1]  H. Haddadi,et al.  Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique , 2008 .

[2]  Maurice Whelan,et al.  Calibration and evaluation of optical systems for full-field strain measurement , 2007 .

[3]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Towards deconvolution to enhance the grid method for in-plane strain measurement , 2014 .

[4]  B. Pan,et al.  Subset-based local vs. finite element-based global digital image correlation: A comparison study , 2016 .

[5]  B. Blaysat,et al.  On image gradients in digital image correlation , 2016 .

[6]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Theoretical Analysis on the Measurement Errors of Local 2D DIC: Part I Temporal and Spatial Uncertainty Quantification of Displacement Measurements , 2014 .

[7]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Using deconvolution to improve the metrological performance of the grid method , 2013 .

[8]  Xiaoping Wu,et al.  Fourier-based interpolation bias prediction in digital image correlation. , 2015, Optics express.

[9]  C. Badulescu,et al.  A Procedure for Accurate One-Dimensional Strain Measurement Using the Grid Method , 2009 .

[10]  Phillip Reu,et al.  Stereo-rig design: Lens selection—part 3 , 2013, Experimental Techniques.

[11]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Practical Poissonian-Gaussian Noise Modeling and Fitting for Single-Image Raw-Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[13]  P. Reu All about speckles: Speckle size measurement , 2014, Experimental Techniques.

[14]  J. Tong,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Effect of Intensity Pattern Noise on the Displacement Measurement Precision of Digital Image Correlation Using Self-correlated Images , 2007 .

[15]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Assessment of measuring errors in DIC using deformation fields generated by plastic FEA , 2009 .

[16]  B. Pan,et al.  The errors in digital image correlation due to overmatched shape functions , 2015 .

[17]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  A reference material for establishing uncertainties in full-field displacement measurements , 2015 .

[18]  M. Tulder Chapter 1 , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[19]  P. Picart,et al.  Demodulation of Spatial Carrier Images: Performance Analysis of Several Algorithms Using a Single Image , 2013, 1310.0725.

[20]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[21]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Investigation of the grid method for accurate in-plane strain measurement , 2009 .

[22]  Julien Réthoré,et al.  A fully integrated noise robust strategy for the identification of constitutive laws from digital images , 2010 .

[23]  Xianglu Dai,et al.  The geometric phase analysis method based on the local high resolution discrete Fourier transform for deformation measurement , 2014 .

[24]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  The Grid Method for In‐plane Displacement and Strain Measurement: A Review and Analysis , 2016 .

[25]  P. Bievre The 2007 International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), JCGM 200:2008 [ISO/IEC Guide 99]: Meeting the need for intercontinentally understood concepts and their associated intercontinentally agreed terms. , 2009 .

[26]  Y Surrel,et al.  Effect of quantization error on the computed phase of phase-shifting measurements. , 1997, Applied optics.

[27]  Dimitri Debruyne,et al.  Impact of Experimental Uncertainties on the Identification of Mechanical Material Properties using DIC , 2015 .

[28]  Stepan Vladimirovitch Lomov,et al.  A Self Adaptive Global Digital Image Correlation Algorithm , 2014, Experimental Mechanics.

[29]  Munther A. Gdeisat,et al.  Fast two-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm based on sorting by reliability following a noncontinuous path. , 2002, Applied optics.

[30]  D J Chen,et al.  Digital speckle-displacement measurement using a complex spectrum method. , 1993, Applied optics.

[31]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Determining displacement and strain maps immune from aliasing effect with the grid method , 2016 .

[32]  J. M. Huntley Noise-immune phase unwrapping algorithm. , 1989, Applied optics.

[33]  Martin Hÿtch,et al.  Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs , 1998 .

[34]  P. Reu All about Speckles: Speckle Density , 2015, Experimental Techniques.

[35]  Phillip L. Reu,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Methods for Exact Subpixel Shifting , 2011 .

[36]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: Effect of Sensor Noise on the Resolution and Spatial Resolution of Displacement and Strain Maps Estimated with the Grid Method , 2014 .

[37]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[38]  Michel Grédiac,et al.  Applying the grid method and infrared thermography to investigate plastic deformation in aluminium multicrystal , 2011 .

[39]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Identification of a set of macroscopic elastic parameters in a 3D woven composite: Uncertainty analysis and regularization , 2015 .

[40]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Progress in developing a standard for dynamic strain analysis , 2011 .

[41]  Motoharu Fujigaki,et al.  Sampling Moiré Method for Accurate Small Deformation Distribution Measurement , 2010 .

[42]  Phillip Reu,et al.  Calibration: A good calibration image , 2013, Experimental Techniques.

[43]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[44]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[45]  Bing Pan,et al.  Comparison of Subset-Based Local and Finite Element-Based Global Digital Image Correlation , 2015 .

[46]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[47]  Wei Tong,et al.  Formulation of Lucas–Kanade Digital Image Correlation Algorithms for Non‐contact Deformation Measurements: A Review , 2013 .

[48]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Effect of interpolation on noise propagation from images to DIC displacement maps , 2016 .

[49]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  Influence of the Analysis Window on the Metrological Performance of the Grid Method , 2016, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[50]  Yaofeng Sun,et al.  Finite element formulation for a digital image correlation method. , 2005, Applied optics.

[51]  P. Reu All about speckles: Contrast , 2015, Experimental Techniques.

[52]  Phillip Reu,et al.  Speckles and their relationship to the digital camera , 2014, Experimental Techniques.

[53]  Xianglu Dai,et al.  Geometric phase analysis based on the windowed Fourier transform for the deformation field measurement , 2014 .

[54]  E. Grafarend Linear and nonlinear models : fixed effects, random effects, and mixed models , 2006 .

[55]  S. Roux,et al.  Comparison of Local and Global Approaches to Digital Image Correlation , 2012 .

[56]  K. Qian,et al.  Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. , 2008, Optics express.

[57]  Roberto Fedele,et al.  Global 2D digital image correlation for motion estimation in a finite element framework: a variational formulation and a regularized, pyramidal, multi‐grid implementation , 2013 .

[58]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  Fast Cartoon + Texture Image Filters , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[59]  David R Burton,et al.  Agglomerative clustering-based approach for two-dimensional phase unwrapping. , 2005, Applied optics.

[60]  Hassan Foroosh,et al.  Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[61]  Frédéric Sur,et al.  On the Propagation of Camera Sensor Noise to Displacement Maps Obtained by DIC - an Experimental Study , 2016 .

[62]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .