Barriers to sustainable economic development : the Dallas–Fort Worth experience

This article examines the scope of existing economic development activity and the motivations and perceptions of practitioners to shed light on the barriers to sustainable practice. In contrast to related fields like urban planning, the economic development literature has minimally examined how practitioners think about sustainable development and the extent to which sustainable development principles are adopted in practice. This omission is significant because economic development policies can have a notable impact on the sustainable development goals of environmental protection and social equity alongside economic growth. To capture the extent to which economic developers engage in sustainable development and the barriers that practitioners face, we study fifteen cities in the Dallas–Fort Worth region. We find that six key barriers – a conventional economic development mindset, incentive-based practice, a lack of resources, ad hoc planning, inter-regional competition, and a lack of coordinated regional planning – impede sustainable economic development in the region.

[1]  Susan L Handy,et al.  City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California's Central Valley , 2009 .

[2]  E. Hamilton-Smith,et al.  Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously , 2003 .

[3]  Nicholas P. Lovrich,et al.  Cultural sources of variations in US urban sustainability attributes , 2008 .

[4]  Jennifer H. Allen,et al.  Portland's Green Building Cluster , 2008 .

[5]  Eric S. Zeemering,et al.  What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials? , 2009 .

[6]  R. Paterson,et al.  Local Government Efforts to Promote the “Three Es” of Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[7]  V. Mathur,et al.  Human Capital-Based Strategy for Regional Economic Development , 1999 .

[8]  E. Glaeser,et al.  The Rise of the Skilled City , 2003 .

[9]  Andrew E. G. Jonas,et al.  The work of cities , 1998 .

[10]  Edward J. Jepson.  The Conceptual Integration of Planning and Sustainability: An Investigation of Planners in the United States , 2003 .

[11]  Maria Manta Conroy,et al.  Moving the Middle Ahead , 2006 .

[12]  Edward J. Blakely,et al.  Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[13]  T. Clark,et al.  The city as an entertainment machine , 2001 .

[14]  Ann Markusen,et al.  Targeting Occupations in Regional and Community Economic Development , 2004 .

[15]  Scott D. Campbell,et al.  Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable , 1996 .

[16]  Edward J. Jepson.  The Adoption of Sustainable Development Policies and Techniques in U.S. Cities , 2004 .

[17]  R. Florida.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[18]  Edward J. Jepson.  Sustainability and the Childe thesis – What are the effects of local characteristics and conditions on sustainable development policy? , 2007 .

[19]  J. Fitzgerald.  Emerald Cities: Urban Sustainability and Economic Development , 2010 .

[20]  George A. Erickcek,et al.  Economic Development Policy in Michigan , 2003 .

[21]  P. Berke,et al.  Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? , 2000 .

[22]  N. G. Leigh,et al.  Economic Revitalization: Cases and Strategies for City and Suburb , 2002 .

[23]  T. Beatley,et al.  Getting it done: An exploration of US sustainability efforts in practice , 2007 .

[24]  A. Bowman.  Terra Incognita: Vacant Land and Urban Strategies , 2004 .

[25]  Adrienne Schmitz,et al.  Regenerating Older Suburbs , 2007 .

[26]  L. Newby.  Sustainable local economic development: A new agenda for action? , 1999 .