Thermodynamic analysis of H2 production from CaO sorption‐enhanced methane steam reforming thermally coupled with chemical looping combustion as a novel technology

Summary In this novel paper, a technique for hydrogen production route of CaO sorption-enhanced methane steam reforming (SEMSR) thermally coupled with chemical looping combustion (CLC) was presented (CLC-SEMSR), which perceived as an improvement of previous methane steam reforming (MSR) thermally coupled with CLC technology (CLC-MSR). The application of CLC instead of furnace achieves the inherent separation of CO2 from flue gas without extra energy required. The required heat for the reformer is provided by thermally coupling CLC. The addition of CaO sorbents can capture CO2 as it is formed from the reformer gas to the solid phase, displacing the normal MSR equilibrium restrictions and obtaining higher purity of H2. The Aspen Plus was used to simulate this novel process on the basis of thermodynamics. The performances of this system examined included the composition of reformer gas, yield of reformer gas (YRg), methane conversion (αM), the overall energy efficiency (η), and exergy efficiency (φ) of this process. The effects of the molar ratio of CaO to methane for reforming (Ca/M) in the range of 0–1.2, the molar ratio of methane for combustion to methane for reforming (M(fuel)/M) in the range of 0.1–0.3, and the molar ratio of NiO to methane for reforming (Ni/M) in the range of 0.4–1.2 were investigated. It has been found to be favored by operating under the conditions of Ca/M = 1, M(fuel)/M = 0.2, and Ni/M = 0.8. The most excellent advantage of CLC-SEMSR was that it could obtain higher purity of H2 (95%) at lower operating temperature (655 °C), as against H2 purity of 77.1% at higher temperature (900 °C) in previous CLC-MSR. In addition, the energy efficiency of this process could reach 83.3% at the optimal conditions. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Grace,et al.  Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO2-acceptor , 2006 .

[2]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  A 300 W laboratory reactor system for chemical-looping combustion with particle circulation , 2006 .

[3]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO , 2004 .

[4]  Mohammad Ameri,et al.  Simulation of an atmospheric SOFC and gas turbine hybrid system using Aspen Plus software , 2013 .

[5]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[6]  M. Chandel,et al.  200‐MW chemical looping combustion based thermal power plant for clean power generation , 2013 .

[7]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Modeling of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming—Part II: Simulation within a novel Ca/Cu chemical loop process for hydrogen production , 2012 .

[8]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Pre‐combustion carbon‐capture technologies for power generation: an engineering‐economic assessment , 2013 .

[9]  Computational Fluid Dynamics in chemical reactor analysis and design: Application to the ZoneFlow™ reactor for methane steam reforming , 2012 .

[10]  Mohammad R. Quddus,et al.  Reduction Kinetics of La Modified NiO/La-γAl2O3 Oxygen Carrier for Chemical-Looping Combustion , 2010 .

[11]  D. Harrison.  Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review , 2008 .

[12]  Douglas P. Harrison,et al.  Hydrogen Production Using Sorption-Enhanced Reaction , 2001 .

[13]  G. Patience,et al.  Chemical‐looping combustion process: Kinetics and mathematical modeling , 2010 .

[14]  M. Saidi,et al.  Methane Steam Reforming Thermally Coupled with Fuel Combustion: Application of Chemical Looping Concept as a Novel Technology , 2013 .

[15]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Modeling of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming in an adiabatic fixed bed reactor , 2012 .

[16]  Feng Wang,et al.  Methane steam reforming: Kinetics and modeling over coating catalyst in micro-channel reactor , 2013 .

[17]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  Thermal Analysis of Chemical-Looping Combustion , 2006 .

[18]  Wenju Wang,et al.  A combined thermodynamic and experimental study on chemical‐looping ethanol reforming with carbon dioxide capture for hydrogen generation , 2013 .

[19]  Christina S. Martavaltzi,et al.  Comparative exergy analysis of sorption enhanced and conventional methane steam reforming , 2012 .

[20]  Ehsan Mostafavi,et al.  Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of CO2 Capture with Calcium Based Sorbents: Experiments and Modeling , 2013 .

[21]  John R. Grace,et al.  Modeling of Sorption-Enhanced Steam Reforming in a Dual Fluidized Bubbling Bed Reactor , 2006 .

[22]  Anders Lyngfelt,et al.  Investigation of NiO-based mixed oxides in a 300-W chemical-looping combustor , 2010 .

[23]  Amin Taheri Najafabadi,et al.  CO2 chemical conversion to useful products: An engineering insight to the latest advances toward sustainability , 2013 .

[24]  Wei-Ping Pan,et al.  Investigation of Chemical Looping Combustion by Solid Fuels. 2. Redox Reaction Kinetics and Product Characterization with Coal, Biomass, and Solid Waste as Solid Fuels and CuO as an Oxygen Carrier , 2006 .

[25]  Zainuddin Abdul Manan,et al.  A new reactor concept for combining oxidative coupling and steam re‐forming of methane: modeling and analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Ruud W. van den Brink,et al.  Hydrotalcite as CO2 Sorbent for Sorption-Enhanced Steam Reforming of Methane , 2006 .

[27]  Wang Lai Yoon,et al.  Modeling and simulation for the methane steam reforming enhanced by in situ CO2 removal utilizing the CaO carbonation for H2 production , 2004 .

[28]  Angeliki A. Lemonidou,et al.  Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming of Methane with Simultaneous CO2 Capture over CaO−Ca12Al14O33 , 2010 .

[29]  Edward S Rubin,et al.  A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[31]  M. Rahimpour,et al.  Enhancement of Hydrogen Production and Carbon Dioxide Capturing in a Novel Methane Steam Reformer Coupled with Chemical Looping Combustion and Assisted by Hydrogen Perm-Selective Membranes , 2013 .

[32]  Kee Young Koo,et al.  Analysis of design variables for an efficient natural gas steam reforming process comprised in a small scale hydrogen fueling station , 2012 .

[33]  Marie Anheden,et al.  Exergy analysis of chemical-looping combustion systems , 1998 .

[34]  Sujit Karmakar,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of high‐ash coal‐fired power plant with carbon dioxide capture , 2013 .

[35]  G Grasa,et al.  New CO2 capture process for hydrogen production combining Ca and Cu chemical loops. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.