Reviewing Automated Sensor-Based Visitor Tracking Studies: Beyond Traditional Observational Methods?

ABSTRACT The method of timing and tracking has a long history within visitor studies and exhibition evaluation. With an increase in indoor tracking research, sensor-based positioning tool usage in museums has grown, as have expectations regarding the efficacy of technological sensing systems. This literature review identifies emerging trends in sensor-based tracking methods used for museum visitor studies. Ten studies are identified, in which five sensor-based solutions are used to access visitor movement in museum settings. These are compared with more established observational timing and tracking methods in terms of obtained level of detail, accuracy, level of obtrusiveness, automation of data entry, ability to time concurrent behaviors, and amount of observer training needed. Although individual sensor-based and traditional, observational methods had both strengths and weaknesses, all sensor-based timing and tracking methods provided automated data entry and the opportunity to track a number of visitors simultaneously regardless of the available personnel.

[1]  Ruck Thawonmas,et al.  A Movement Data Analysis and Synthesis Tool for Museum Visitors' Behaviors , 2009, PCM.

[2]  Jean Wineman,et al.  Constructing Spatial Meaning , 2010 .

[3]  George Roussos,et al.  Examining the Effect of Visitor Motivation on Observed Visit Strategies Using Mobile Computer Technologies , 2013 .

[4]  William H. Bolen,et al.  Why We Buy the Science of Shopping , 2000 .

[5]  Kevin Curran,et al.  A survey of active and passive indoor localisation systems , 2012, Comput. Commun..

[6]  Stephen Bitgood,et al.  Pedestrian Choice Behavior at Shopping Mall Intersections in China and the United States , 2013 .

[7]  M. Zancanaro,et al.  Indoor positioning in cultural heritage: Challenges and a solution , 2012, 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[8]  Kevin Curran,et al.  An evaluation of indoor location determination technologies , 2011, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[9]  Martin Boeker,et al.  Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[10]  Kerry Bronnenkant,et al.  Timing and Tracking: Unlocking Visitor Behavior , 2009 .

[11]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  The Influence of a Location-Aware Mobile Guide on Museum Visitors' Behavior , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[12]  Experimenting with Engagement , 2011, Science and engineering ethics.

[13]  Harris H. Shettel,et al.  An Overview of Visitor Studies , 1996 .

[14]  Petar Solic,et al.  RFID-based solution for galleries and museums visit modelling using Markov model, BBN's and MAP decisions , 2010, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Database Syst..

[15]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Analysis of People Trajectories with Ubiquitous Sensors in a Science Museum , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  S. Bitgood,et al.  An Analysis of Visitor Circulation: Movement Patterns and the General Value Principle , 2006 .

[17]  B. Serrell Paying Attention: The Duration and Allocation of Visitors' Time in Museum Exhibitions , 1997 .

[18]  Eyal de Lara,et al.  Location Systems: An Introduction to the Technology Behind Location Awareness , 2008, Location Systems.

[19]  Georg Gartner,et al.  Exploring Human Spatio-Temporal Behaviour Patterns , 2008 .

[20]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Visualizing Proximity‐Based Spatiotemporal Behavior of Museum Visitors using Tangram Diagrams , 2014, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[22]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Analyzing Museum Visitors' Behavior Patterns , 2007, User Modeling.

[23]  Eilean Hooper-Greenhill,et al.  Chapter 22. Studying Visitors , 2007 .

[24]  Aaron Harwood,et al.  Optimizing indoor location recognition through wireless fingerprinting at the Ian Potter Museum of Art , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[25]  Wolfgang Tschacher,et al.  An Integrative and Comprehensive Methodology for Studying Aesthetic Experience in the Field , 2014 .

[26]  S. Bitgood,et al.  Not Another Step! Economy of Movement and Pedestrian Choice Point Behavior in Shopping Malls , 2006 .

[27]  Bruce V. Lewenstein Experimenting with Engagement - Commentary on: Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[28]  George Roussos,et al.  Mobile sensing, BYOD and Big Data Analytics: New technologies for audience research in museums , 2014 .

[29]  Martin Tröndle,et al.  The effects of curatorial arrangements , 2014 .

[30]  Sherry Hsi,et al.  RFID enhances visitors' museum experience at the Exploratorium , 2005, CACM.

[31]  Chris Hide,et al.  Opening indoors: The advent of indoor positioning , 2013 .

[32]  W. Tschacher,et al.  The Physiology of Phenomenology: The Effects of Artworks , 2012 .

[33]  Josep Blat,et al.  An Analysis of Visitors' Behavior in the Louvre Museum: A Study Using Bluetooth Data , 2014, ArXiv.

[34]  Josep Blat,et al.  New Tools for Studying Visitor Behaviours in Museums: A Case Study at the Louvre , 2012, ENTER.

[35]  Hans-Joachim Klein,et al.  Tracking Visitor Circulation in Museum Settings , 1993 .