Dynamic MCDM for Multi Group Decision Making

Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models make preference decisions over multiple attributes’ alternatives available, which in most of the cases conflict among themselves. On the other hand, the classic MCDM model assumes that the decision maker has a pre-defined fixed set of criteria, when taking a decision, and is presented with a clear picture of all available alternatives. This classic view reduces the solution to computing the score of each alternative, producing a ranking, and choosing the one that maximizes this value. As most of the real-world decision making scenarios take place in dynamic environments, involving multiple alternatives which usually have conflicting attributes, classic MCDM models do not really satisfy their requirements, especially when we deal with multiple groups in the decision process. Dynamic MCDM models are more appropriate to solve real decision problems, since they cater for the impact of time within the decision making process. In this paper, we investigate an MCDM model for group decision making, by taking into consideration its dynamic perspective. A case-study about hotel ranking, involving multi-groups in the decision making process is sketched to illustrate the approach.

[1]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2000 .

[2]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro,et al.  Collaborative Dynamic Decision Making: A Case Study from B2B Supplier Selection , 2011, EWG-DSS.

[3]  Ana Simão,et al.  Web-based Gis for Collaborative Planning and Public Participation: an Application to the Strategic Planning of Wind Farm Sites Keywords: Spatial Planning Collaborative Planning Wind Energy Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (mc-sdss) Argumentation Map Learning Environment World Wide Web , 2022 .

[4]  Ashantha Goonetilleke,et al.  A New Fuzzy Multicriteria Evaluation Method for Group Site Selection in GIS , 2003 .

[5]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  BALANCING CONSENSUS AND CONFLICT WITH A GIS-BASED MULTI-PARTICIPANT, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT TOOL , 2003 .

[6]  R. Mesiar,et al.  Aggregation operators: new trends and applications , 2002 .

[7]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro,et al.  A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Shaofeng Liu,et al.  Decision Support Systems – Collaborative Models and Approaches in Real Environments , 2011, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.

[9]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview , 2004 .

[10]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  GIS-Supported Collaborative Decision Making: Results of an Experiment , 2001 .

[11]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science , 2001 .

[12]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[13]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro,et al.  Dynamic MCDM with future knowledge for supplier selection , 2014, J. Decis. Syst..

[14]  Jürgen Fleiß,et al.  Collaborative decision systems in economics and in complex societal and environmental applications , 2015, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Maria Rita Sarmento de Almeida Ribeiro Real-Time Planetary Landing Site Selection — A Non-Exhaustive Approach , 2012 .

[16]  George J. Klir,et al.  Facets of Systems Science , 1991 .

[17]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro,et al.  FIF: A fuzzy information fusion algorithm based on multi-criteria decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[18]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Mohammadreza Jelokhani-Niaraki,et al.  A Web 3.0-driven Collaborative Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support System , 2012 .

[20]  P. Kyem Of Intractable Conflicts and Participatory GIS Applications: The Search for Consensus amidst Competing Claims and Institutional Demands , 2004 .