Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders

The paper addresses the topic of supplier selection in public procurement. According to European directives, when tenders are awarded through the “Most Economically Advantageous Tender” (MEAT) criterion, the awarding committee has to decide the tender evaluation criteria of the presented bids in advance. The authors propose a decision making tool that is aimed at helping the awarding committee in this difficult task and, at the same time, maintaining a transparent procedure in accordance with governmental procurement regulations and requirements as well as guaranteeing fair and equal evaluation of all bids. In this regard, the decision problem of supplier selection is addressed by applying an extension of the DEA (data envelopment analysis) methodology. The cross-efficiency evaluation is used for selecting the best supplier among the eligible candidates. The proposed technique allows the evaluation of quantitative data related to vendor selection and keeps the transparency features requested by public procurement. In addition, all bids are equally assessed according to the same objectively defined weights without any subjective setting by the public officers. The effectiveness and efficiency of the approach is supported by a case study that pertains to the tender of an Italian public agency.

[1]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A methodology for strategic sourcing , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Harold Lewis,et al.  Bids, Tenders & Proposals: Winning Business through Best Practice , 2003 .

[3]  Panos L. Lorentziadis Post-objective determination of weights of the evaluation factors in public procurement tenders , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection , 2007 .

[5]  C. Weber,et al.  Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers , 1996 .

[6]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Vendor selection criteria and methods , 1991 .

[7]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[8]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[9]  Zohar J. Herbsman,et al.  COST-TIME BIDDING CONCEPT: AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH , 1990 .

[10]  Fredrik Malmberg Competitiveness in the Context of Procurement , 2008 .

[11]  Elmar G. Wolfstetter,et al.  Corruption in Procurement Auctions , 2006 .

[12]  Sotiris P. Gayialis,et al.  An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing , 2004 .

[13]  Zohar J. Herbsman,et al.  MULTIPARAMETER BIDDING SYSTEM - INNOVATION IN CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION , 1992 .

[14]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  MACBETH — An Interactive Path Towards the Construction of Cardinal Value Functions , 1994 .

[15]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A review of contractor selection practice in the U.K. construction industry , 1995 .

[16]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Seyhan Sipahi,et al.  A multi‐criteria model for bidding evaluation , 2010 .

[18]  Tina Søreide,et al.  Corruption in public procurement. Causes, consequences and cures , 2002 .

[19]  Sergios Lambropoulos The use of time and cost utility for construction contract award under European Union Legislation , 2007 .

[20]  Tsu-Ming Yeh,et al.  Customer‐focused rating system of supplier quality performance , 2004 .

[21]  I. Ozkarahan,et al.  Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure , 2007 .

[22]  João Carlos Lourenço,et al.  Development of Reusable Bid Evaluation Models for the Portuguese Electric Transmission Company , 2008, Decis. Anal..

[23]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[24]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A note on "A methodology for supply base optimization" , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[25]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement , 1991 .

[28]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey , 2004 .

[29]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A conceptual alternative to current tendering practice , 1993 .

[30]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A review of methods supporting supplier selection , 2001 .

[31]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[32]  Zohar J. Herbsman,et al.  A+B BIDDING METHOD--HIDDEN SUCCESS STORY FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION , 1995 .

[33]  Guy Callender,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on public procurement , 2005 .

[34]  Riccardo Dulmin,et al.  Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method , 2003 .

[35]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Contractor selection using multi criteria utility theory: an additive mode , 1998 .

[36]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Participatory Action Research Approach to Public Sector Procurement Selection , 2012 .

[37]  Zeger Degraeve,et al.  An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[39]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Fong-Yuen Ding,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement , 2000 .

[41]  P. J. H. Baily,et al.  Purchasing Principles and Management , 1981 .

[42]  Mariagrazia Dotoli,et al.  Using fuzzy decision making for supplier selection in public procurement , 2011 .

[43]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Supplier selection by the new AR-IDEA model , 2008 .

[44]  Selwyn Piramuthu,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Knowledge-based framework for automated dynamic supply chain configuration , 2003 .

[45]  M. Braglia,et al.  A quality assurance‐oriented methodology for handling trade‐offs in supplier selection , 2000 .