Developing A Conceptual Framework For Factors Affecting Active Participation In Business To Business Online Business Communities

The primary purpose of this paper is to provide better understanding of the factors affecting active participation in Business-to-Business Online Business Communities (B2B OBCs). Toward this goal, this study proposed a conceptual framework based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET), Uses and Gratification theory (U&G), and the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM). The framework was further explored and tested using semi structured interview with twelve members of B2B OBCs. The findings suggest that reciprocity, trust, reputation/status, functional factors, system quality, information quality and service quality may affect the level of B2B OBCs’ participation. Acknowledging the qualitative nature of this study, the proposed framework was only tested on small number of participants and therefore findings limit generalisation to the wider business population. Therefore a future empirically study will be conducted in order to thoroughly test the framework.

[1]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Yan Li,et al.  Students' participation intention in an online discussion forum: Why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Joseph Cothrel,et al.  Measuring the success of an online community , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Wind Blurring the lines: is there a need to rethink industrial marketing? , 2006 .

[6]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[7]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz,et al.  Buyer‐seller relationships and information sources in an e‐commerce world , 2004 .

[11]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[12]  Joon Koh,et al.  Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Anatoliy A. Gruzd,et al.  Online Communities , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[14]  Rodney Carr,et al.  Factors Affecting SMEs' Willingness to Share Knowledge Online: A Path Model , 2010, Bled eConference.

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  E-Commerce Systems Success: An Attempt to Extend and Respecify the Delone and MaClean Model of IS Success , 2001, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[17]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[18]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of information technology deployment on trust, commitment and value creation in business relationships , 2004 .

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Joseph Cothrel,et al.  On-line communities: helping them form and grow , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  Julie Fisher,et al.  Developing Business Community Portals for SMEs - Issues of Design, Development and Sustainability , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[22]  Vishal Kashyap,et al.  The use of online marketplaces for competitive advantage: a Latin American perspective , 2004 .

[23]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[24]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user's participation in video UCC services , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  John S. Edwards,et al.  Toward understanding inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: insight from a UK investigation , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Mikko O. J. Laine Virtual Communities: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2009 .

[27]  Carolyn A. Lin Standpoint: Looking back: The contribution of Blumler and Katz's uses of mass communication to communication research , 1996 .

[28]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Exploring the Moderating Effects of Commitment and Perceived Value of Knowledge in Explaining Knowledge Contribution in Virtual Communities , 2006, PACIS.

[29]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  Can Social Exchange Theory Explain Individual Knowledge-Sharing Behavior? A Meta-Analysis , 2008, ICIS.

[31]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human-computer interaction , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  S. R. Hiltz Online communities , 1983 .

[33]  Ygal Bendavid,et al.  Evolving B2B e‐commerce adaptation for SME suppliers , 2009 .

[34]  John G. Watson,et al.  Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance , 2007 .

[35]  G. Hutton Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[36]  C. Parker,et al.  Factors influencing Australian SMEs knowledge sharing online , 2008 .

[37]  C. Mathwick Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behavior , 2002 .

[38]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  L. Liao,et al.  Knowledge-sharing in R&D departments: a social power and social exchange theory perspective , 2008 .

[40]  Zhongju Zhang,et al.  Feeling the Sense of Community in Social Networking Usage , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Modeling Participation in an Online Travel Community , 2004 .

[42]  R. Morgan,et al.  Customer advocacy and the impact of B2B loyalty programs , 2008 .

[43]  B. Nonnecke,et al.  WHY LURKERS LURK , 2001 .

[44]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Motivations to participate in online communities , 2010, CHI.

[45]  Thomas E. Ruggiero Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[46]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[47]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[48]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Determinants of successful virtual communities: Contributions from system characteristics and social factors , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[49]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  C. Parker,et al.  Socio-technical factors influencing channel use for knowledge-sharing in regional SME networks , 2008 .

[51]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Classification Schema for Online Communities , 1998 .

[52]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[53]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  The Effect of Individual Needs, Trust and Identification in Explaining Participation Intentions in Virtual Communities , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[55]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[56]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community , 2004 .

[57]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  Michael C. A. Borovicka,et al.  Developing an Online Business Community: A Travel Industry Case Study , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[59]  C. Perry,et al.  Technical and social bonds within business-to-business relationships , 2002 .

[60]  Petra Schubert,et al.  Virtual Communities of Transaction: The Role of Personalization in Electronic Commerce , 2000, Electron. Mark..

[61]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Learning in Online Forums , 2003 .

[62]  Jin Yong Park,et al.  What makes online community members commit? A social exchange perspective , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[63]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: model development and empirical test , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[64]  Sheng Wu,et al.  Exploring Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Teams: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[65]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  A social exchange architecture for distributed Web communities , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[67]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[68]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[69]  Yu-Chen Chen,et al.  The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty , 2006, Internet Res..