One size doesn't fit all: the meanings of women's leisure.

Researchers who study women's leisure in the 1990s are moving into a discourse about the inability and inadequacy of determining that leisure is the same for all women or that "one leisure size fits all." The purpose of this paper is to extend an integrative review undertaken in 1990 to ascertain what we know about women's leisure in 1996. An integrative review was the strategy for reviewing research that focused on inferring generalizations about substantive issues from a set of studies directly bearing on these issues. The analyses resulted in three themes grounded in the literature of the past six years along with guiding hypotheses developed within each theme. The "megathemes" included gender, continua of meanings, and diversity. KEYWORDS: women, gender; feminism, diversity, meanings, leisure, social change Introduction Until 15 years ago, women's leisure was an invisible area of study relatively devoid of theory. Attempts to make generalizations about the common world of women with a focus on understanding the social psychological "meaning" of women's leisure in a one size fits all approach have been the focus of the past decade. These attempts at generating universal understandings have been a necessary, but insufficient, step for understanding leisure behavior. The research about feminism and women's leisure in the 1990s is now moving into a discourse about the inability and inadequacy of determining that one leisure size fits all. As Dustin (1992) suggested, we must return to the same starting point if we are to begin anew our quest for a greater understanding. The new quest, however, has shifted from "meaning" to "meanings" regarding women's leisure. This shift also parallels the role of the new wave of thinking about feminism from totalizing and universalizing women's experiences to seeing the need for many feminisms (Henderson, Bialeschki, Shaw, & Freysinger, 1996). The purpose of this paper is to extend the integrative review undertaken in 1990 (Henderson, 1990a) to ascertain what is known about women's leisure in 1996. In this earlier review, the stated purpose was to synthesize the literature to explore the complex interrelationships and dimensions of women's lives. I concluded that frameworks for understanding women's leisure were emerging, a variety of methods were being used, and possibilities existed for empowering women through continued leisure research (Henderson, 1990a). Further, I suggested that a "meaning" was emerging (i.e., women share a common world in their inequality in leisure when compared to male privilege, social interactions represent a common focus of women's leisure, women tend to use the home and nonstructured activities as the primary place and means for leisure expression, much of women's leisure is fragmented, and many women do not feel they are entitled to leisure). The reality is that a single meaning has not manifested itself in the past six years, as will be shown in this updated integrative review. Rather, numerous meanings have arisen based on the life situations of women and the changing nature of the understanding of gender and leisure. Background: Finding the Right Fit In the past few years, researchers have constructed a body of knowledge about women's leisure. We have begun to move from using gender as a variable to making it a central theoretical concept. The main North American concerns, as well as those of other Western countries, have been in exploring women's experiences of leisure within the context of women's lives (Yule, 1992). For example, we have learned about social psychological ideas such as the ethic of caring (e.g., Gilligan, 1982) that drives many of the decisions about what women do with their "free" time (e.g., Henderson & Allen, 1991; Harrington, Dawson, & Bolla, 1992). Scraton (1994) suggested that studies done in Britain (e.g., Deem, 1986; Green, Hebron, & Woodward, 1987) about women's leisure have resulted in structural analyses such as problematizing the definition of leisure and situating leisure within the holistic context of women's lives. …

[1]  J. Towner,et al.  Women, gender, leisure and place: towards a more 'humanistic' geography of women's leisure. , 1995 .

[2]  Linda L. Caldwell,et al.  Leisure and identity formation in male and female adolescents: a preliminary examination. , 1995 .

[3]  C. J. M. Karsten,et al.  Women's leisure: divergence, reconceptualization and change - the case of the Netherlands , 1995 .

[4]  K. Henderson,et al.  The ethic of care: leisure possibilities and constraints for women. , 1991 .

[5]  Valeria J. Freysinger Leisure with Children and Parental Satisfaction: Further Evidence of a Sex Difference in the Experience of Adult Roles and Leisure. , 1994 .

[6]  B. Wilhite,et al.  Leisure in Daily Life: Older Widows Living Alone , 1994 .

[7]  D. Whitson,et al.  Women's Leisure in a Resource Industry Town: Problems and Issues , 1992 .

[8]  B. Wearing Leisure and Women's Identity: Conformity or Individuality? , 1991 .

[9]  L. Caldwell,et al.  Urinary incontinence in women: implications for therapeutic recreation. , 1994 .

[10]  Gender and tourist experiences: assessing women's shared meanings for Beatrix Potter , 1994 .

[11]  M. Bialeschki,et al.  Re-entering Leisure: Transition Within the Role of Motherhood , 1994 .

[12]  M. Bialeschki,et al.  Leisure Research and the Social Structure of Feminism , 1992 .

[13]  K. Henderson,et al.  Gender‐based analysis of leisure constraints , 1995 .

[14]  M. Bialeschki,et al.  A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment for women , 1991 .

[15]  K. Henderson,et al.  The meaning of leisure for women: an integrative review of the research , 1990 .

[16]  K. Henderson Perspectives on analyzing gender, women, and leisure. , 1994 .

[17]  J. Yule Gender and leisure policy , 1992 .

[18]  Juanita M. Firestone,et al.  A comparison of women's and men's leisure time: subtle effects of the double day. , 1994 .

[19]  K. Henderson Anatomy is not destiny: A feminist analysis of the scholarship on women's leisure , 1990 .

[20]  A. Dattilo,et al.  Leisure Orientations and Self-Esteem in Women with Low Incomes Who are Overweight , 1994 .

[21]  K. Fox Negotiating in a World of Change: Ecofeminist Guideposts for Leisure Scholarship , 1994 .

[22]  M. Floyd,et al.  Gender, race, and subjective social class and their association with leisure preferences , 1995 .

[23]  S. Shaw Dereifying family leisure: An examination of women's and men's everyday experiences and perceptions of family time , 1992 .

[24]  K. Henderson A Feminist Analysis of Selected Professional Recreation Literature about Girls/Women from 1907-1990. , 1993 .

[25]  K. Henderson,et al.  Women with physical disabilities and the negotiation of leisure constraints , 1995 .

[26]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Methods for Integrative Reviews , 1980 .

[27]  C. C. Riddick,et al.  An Examination of the Life Satisfaction and Importance of Leisure in the Lives of Older Female Retirees: A Comparison of Blacks to Whites , 1994 .

[28]  D. Dawson,et al.  Objective and Subjective Constraints on Women's Enjoyment of Leisure , 1992 .

[29]  R. Hutchison Women and the elderly in Chicago's public parks. , 1994 .

[30]  G. Godbey,et al.  Self-Esteem, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status: Their Relation to Perceptions of Constraint on Leisure Among Adolescents , 1994 .

[31]  Body image as a leisure constraint: Examining the experience of aerobic exercise classes for young women , 1995 .

[32]  M. Bialeschki,et al.  Negotiating Constraints to Women's Physical Recreation , 1993 .

[33]  D. Dustin The dance of the dispossessed: on patriarchy, feminism and the practice of leisure science. , 1992 .

[34]  R. Boyle,et al.  Dallas with balls: televized sport, soap opera and male and female pleasures , 1993 .

[35]  Valeria J. Freysinger,et al.  Women's Leisure: Affiliation, Self-Determination, Empowerment and Resistance? , 1992 .

[36]  Valeria J. Freysinger The dialectics of leisure and development for women and men in mid-life: an interpretive study. , 1995 .

[37]  K. Henderson Broadening an understanding of women, gender, and leisure. , 1994 .

[38]  K. Henderson The Contribution of Feminism to an Understanding of Leisure Constraints , 1991 .

[39]  D. Whitson,et al.  Women, leisure and familism: relationships and isolation in small town Canada , 1991 .

[40]  S. Shaw Gender, leisure, and constraint: Towards a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. , 1994 .

[41]  S. Shaw Women's leisure time — using time budget data to examine current trends and future predictions , 1991 .

[42]  Christine Cornell McCreedy,et al.  Gender and Family Status Across the Life Course: Constraints on Five Types of Leisure , 1993 .

[43]  N. Theberge,et al.  Gender Differences in the Likelihood that Work Reduction will Lead to an Increase in Leisure , 1992 .

[44]  D. Dawson,et al.  Who has it best? Women's labor force participation, perceptions of leisure and constraints to enjoyment of leisure. , 1995 .