暂无分享,去创建一个
There are many case studies for which the formulation of RDF constraints and the validation of RDF data conforming to these constraint is very important. As a part of the collaboration with the W3C
and the DCMI working groups on RDF validation, we identified major
RDF validation requirements and initiated an RDF validation requirements
database which is available to contribute at http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation.
The purpose of this database is to collaboratively collect case studies, use
cases, requirements, and solutions regarding RDF validation. Although,
there are multiple constraint languages which can be used to formulate
RDF constraints (associated with these requirements), there is no standard
way to formulate them. This paper serves to evaluate to which extend
each requirement is satisfied by each of these constraint languages.
We take reasoning into account as an important pre-validation step and
therefore map constraints to DL in order to show that each constraint
can be mapped to an ontology describing RDF constraints generically.
[1] Ian Horrocks,et al. Keys, Nominals, and Concrete Domains , 2003, IJCAI.
[2] Jeremy J. Carroll,et al. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language RDF-Based Semantics , 2009 .
[3] Ian Horrocks,et al. A Description Logic Primer , 2012, ArXiv.
[4] Jens Lehmann,et al. Test-driven evaluation of linked data quality , 2014, WWW.
[5] Kai Eckert,et al. Requirements on RDF Constraint Formulation and Validation , 2014, Dublin Core Conference.